Ontology meeting 2017-11-06
- Resurrecting obsolete GO terms:
(Pascale): What should we do when a term wit the same name/label is being recreated? See for eg: 'transcription regulator activity'
- Logical definition vs. asserted terms
(Pascale): I have been removing SubClasses when they are redundant with the logical definition. But in some releases of the ontology they are not added back. Would it be safer to always assert both? See for example: GO:0015603 - I would have removed the SubClasses.