Ontology meeting 2021-11-01
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- Group members: Pascale, Karen, Harold, Raymond, Peter, Jim, Tanya, Kimberly, Sierra, David, Chris, Paul
- Present:
- Regrets: Paul, Tanya
Agenda
Primary input/output versus input and output in the ontology versus in annotations
See example 2: http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Annotation_Extension_Relation:has_output#2._Specifying_the_product_of_a_biosynthetic_process
We ask people to annotate as if the were using 'has primary output'; can the annotations be treated as if the used 'has primary output' in the reasoner, so that we could potentially 'deepen' annotations if appropriate?
- Concern (Kimberly) having differences between what is in the ontology versus what curators do
- Chris proposes to use 'has primary input' in annotations, and align ontology to match that for example in 'binding' and 'kinase activity' and other terms currently using 'has input'
- Steps:
- Makes changes to annotation editors: has input -> has primary input
- Update GO_REL to include has primary input/ has primary output
- Fix design patterns
- Apply design patterns
- Generate rules to make sure design patterns are applied in ontology
- Show logical definitions to curators
- Noctua menus should prefill relations from DP
- Show Logical definitions in AmiGO and QuickGO
- Update annotations to the correct relations + how do we decide what is the primary input if people have used more than one input
alternative proposal:
- keep using has input, this means the same as what we currently use as 'has primary input', use 'has participant' for other reaction participants
ATP-dependent activity- again
https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/3963
Subsets
Discussion:
- Should we have parent/children terms in the subset:
- Redundant terms: https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/22276
- Depends on the application; for ribbon display we want to avoid; for gene grouping this may make sense
- We could consider 2 levels - one general level and if there are too many annotations, a second level of slim terms, as if it were chapters and subchapters
Signaling issues encountered in subset workshop
https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/22273 Need to invite Helen and Val to a meeting to explain the proposal
New taxon constraints project
https://github.com/orgs/geneontology/projects/71
Decision on ChEBI update?
https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/pull/22092
- AI from last week: Harold and Pascale to write to Alan, Anneticket
- See PR - Harold will write to CHeBI and request the 8 categories mentioned by Alan