sjcarbon has joined the channel
sjcarbon: sorry i'm late
sjcarbon: are we waiting for amelia and mary?
sjcarbon: chris won't be joining us today
ben: mary n chris
gwg: I'm here
sjcarbon: ah yes, hello!
sjcarbon: no mary on skype, maybe we should just go on...
sjcarbon: first action item:
sjcarbon: compare different displays for the term qualifier.
sjcarbon: people seemed to be hapy with #2?
rama: i was happy with #2. Did everyone take a look?
ben: i already voted
gwg: Did anyone see the email I sent out after that, about sorting options?
eurie: i prefer 2 over 1
ben: sorting or just qualifier display options
ben: I think it should just be consistant with other settings (not sure what those are)
gwg: I'll make it sticky - I think it makes more sense to view the 'not' assocs separately throughout a session
gwg: also - any prefs on how to set the option? A toggle saying 'view NOT associations separately' (or something similar), or do people want clickable column headings, or some other option?
rama: Gwg, where is the option to set the preference to display the Not annotations separately (sorry i am little slow)
gwg: I haven't put it in that display - I wanted some input before implementing it
rama: ho I see
rama: I think the other options we have currently are not sticky..am i right?
gwg: some options are sticky, like the sort in the term / gp search, and whether you view the compact or the full representation of the tree
gwg: others aren't
rama: and what would the default be?
gwg: default would be to have the NOTs intermingled with the other assocs
ben: no comment
rama: okay. please send some mockups for comments and we will take it from there. is that okay?
gwg: next item?
sjcarbon: lemme see...
sjcarbon: contact GO list...done
sjcarbon: next item: ask chris about splitting up gp count by qualifier
gwg: we did that, and it was going to prove nasty
sjcarbon: i've forgotten why we were going to ask though.
gwg: people wanted GP counts for the various association qualifiers, but it was going to be a pain to calculate
sjcarbon: next item:
sjcarbon: Put decision tree onto future agendas.
sjcarbon: we can take this off now, right?
gwg: what is this decision tree?
gwg: If it's the ev code one, it was done ages ago
sjcarbon: off it goes.
gwg: well, putting it on the website was done, putting it on the agenda has also been done now
sjcarbon: i think that does it for our action items.
rama: about this release...
rama: we should limit it to the feature that Amelia is implementing now and move it forward
sjcarbon: everything is ready except the qualifiers.
sjcarbon: tag and go with this one feature.
rama: okay. sounds good.
gwg: sorry, it's partly my fault because I've been off work and having days off and so on... tut tut!
sjcarbon: anything else webby to discuss? if not, i have one more thing.
ben: time line amelia? just trying to plan my week?
rama: no problem..
gwg: Do I need to do mock ups?
rama: no, you can put it on toy and let us know.
gwg: End of the week at the latest then
sjcarbon: Anything more webby?
sjcarbon: i've got a first pass of mary's graphs working off of the database.
sjcarbon: it needs to be made more efficient (so if you all pounce on it right now, it will smoke my workstation), but all of the basics are in there:
sjcarbon: right now, it is working on the wrong database,
sjcarbon: but i'll try to fix that
sjcarbon: i'll start soliciting input soon, but you can start taking a look at it as i progress.
rama: sounds good
sjcarbon: right now, it needs firefox or opera. a line of code will add safari. more to come.
sjcarbon: i'll post to the list this week with more information.
sjcarbon: and instructions.
sjcarbon: and what data to add, etc.
sjcarbon: i'm good. anybody else?
sjcarbon: i think i'm having logging problems, could someone else send me the log.
rama: you mean the transcript?
sjcarbon: yes. please.
rama: i can
sjcarbon: thank you!
sjcarbon: if there's nothing else...?