10March09 Phone Conference: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Action Items from electronic jamboree== | ==Action Items from electronic jamboree== | ||
* GAF file generated from the wiki page: can everyone have a look and let us know if there are problems with the file? | |||
==PAINT update== | |||
* http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/RefGenProgress_2009-02 | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
** Can we do = carbamoyl-phosphate synthase (ammonia) activity (ISS) => urea cycle IC | ** Can we do = carbamoyl-phosphate synthase (ammonia) activity (ISS) => urea cycle IC | ||
** ie, does that give two meanings to IC? We can just be careful when we propagate annotations to use IC from EXP? | ** ie, does that give two meanings to IC? We can just be careful when we propagate annotations to use IC from EXP? | ||
==Annotating biochemical pathways== | |||
Setting up a working group | |||
==Next conference call== | ==Next conference call== | ||
Revision as of 14:49, 9 March 2009
Present
Action Items from electronic jamboree
- GAF file generated from the wiki page: can everyone have a look and let us know if there are problems with the file?
PAINT update
IC from EXP versus IC from ISS
- Stems from the electronic jamborees:
- Mouse = carbamoyl-phosphate synthase (ammonia) activity (IMP) => urea cycle IC
- Can we do = carbamoyl-phosphate synthase (ammonia) activity (ISS) => urea cycle IC
- ie, does that give two meanings to IC? We can just be careful when we propagate annotations to use IC from EXP?
Annotating biochemical pathways
Setting up a working group
Next conference call
Tuesday April 14, 2009, 8 AM PDT, 10 AM CDT, 11 AM EST, 4 PM BST
Return to Reference_Genome_Annotation_Project