2011 USC Meeting Agenda: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 41: Line 41:
#** software status update (AmiGO, GOOSE, GOLD, etc. - Seth)
#** software status update (AmiGO, GOOSE, GOLD, etc. - Seth)
#* Monitoring customer satisfaction
#* Monitoring customer satisfaction
#* GO Help Rotation/designated person to deal with GO help (Rama)


== Action Items from Bar Harbor GOC meeting ==
== Action Items from Bar Harbor GOC meeting ==

Revision as of 14:27, 14 April 2011

Minutes: (By hosts of previous meeting: MGI)

Welcome; Review of schedule and agenda

  • Introductions.
  • GO PI announcements

Overview of the Aims and Deliverables included in the GO NIH grant application

  1. Literature-based annotations (Rama)
    • vision (i.e. efficiency, quality and consistency goals)
      • mention QC checks? How groups should be kept up-to-date? See Managers discussion here
    • current status/accomplishments
    • possible metrics
    • timeline
  2. Biological focus-group annotations (Emily)
    • vision (and entire text-book TOC?)
    • current status/accomplishments
      • New ontologies terms added at recent meetings?
    • possible metrics/milestones
  3. Phylogenetically-based annotations (Paul T)
    • vision (e.g. dynamically adding a new protein to the right family, versioning with stable IDs for ancestral nodes)
    • current status/accomplishments
    • possible metrics
  4. Common Annotation Framework (Suzi and Paul S)
    • vision
    • Current Efforts
      • PomBase community annotation tool (Val?)
      • Textpresso, Phenote, PAINT-web, and all the rest...
    • timeline and milestones
  5. Ontology development (David)
    • Overall goals (e.g. cross-products completion)
    • recent projects - notes/accomplishments
      • Transcription factors (Karen C)
      • Signaling (Becky)
      • Chemicals (David or Tanya)
      • software utilities (Reasoners, QC - Chris)
    • timeline
  6. Community resources and Dissemination (Emily & Rama)
    • recent projects - notes/accomplishments
      • Current Efforts in Community GO Annotation (Emily)
        • BHF-UCL team training programs for MSc students and staff training at UCL. How productive are UCL students and staff at annotating? (Ruth)
        • Texas A&M annotation competition? (CACAO)
        • TAIR GO annotations from submitted publications?
      • software status update (AmiGO, GOOSE, GOLD, etc. - Seth)
    • Monitoring customer satisfaction
    • GO Help Rotation/designated person to deal with GO help (Rama)

Action Items from Bar Harbor GOC meeting

Working plans for Aims and Deliverables over the next 4 & 12 months

  1. Literature-based annotations (Rama)
    • New annotation sanity checks being proposed
    • ECO presentation.
      • Would be nice to establish how the ECO project should be used by GOC, now that the first draft has been published. Edimmer 17:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC) (Marcus will present ECO update)
    • Pre- vs post-composition of GO terms, and use of column 16. Should we be adding in terms for E.g. apoptosis of individual cell types (if they have no other parent in a different node), or should we be capturing this at the annotation stage using column 16? What is the time-scale of using column 16 and what data types can be included? (Becky)
  2. Biological focus-group annotations (Emily)
    • Transcription factor workshop?
    • Working in a research environment and the impact on annotation targets? (Ruth)
      • BHF-UCL team involved in annotating specific genes identified through GWAS or microarray (Ruth)
  3. Phylogenetically-based annotations (Paul T)
    • Enhancements to PAINT & DB (Suzi)
    • Incorporating InterPro motifs into PAINT
  4. Common Annotation Framework (Suzi and Paul S)
    • HELP!
  5. Ontology development (David)
    • OBO/OWL migration (Chris)
    • Protein complexes
      • What is within the scope of GO, and what is in the scope of PRO?
      • Should GO capture gene product specific protein complexes, or species-specific protein complexes?
      • Should protein complexes be defined based on function or component information? (Becky and Peter D'E)
    • HELP!
  6. Community resources and Dissemination (Emily & Rama)
    • InterPro2GO presentation
      • Sarah Burge, InterPro. Time requested: 40 min presentation, 20 mins discussion.
      • Contents: Brief summary of the revised guidelines for the GO mapping of InterPro entries. To include: InterPro evidence requirements, new policy of mapping Domain, Site and Repeat entries, changes in coverage between the old and new approaches, occasions where InterPro is unable to GO map an entry and finally, the automatic checks to prevent taxonomy violations and assignment of redundant terms.
    • AmiGO (Seth?)
    • HELP!

Satellite meetings

  1. Cardiac Conduction ontology development workshop (Ruth&David) [1]
    • pre-workshop discussion (David, Ruth, Doug, Tanya, Becky, Paola, Stan)
    • probably straight after main meeting closes on 19th May
    • workshop date not yet set, aiming for Sept-Nov 2011
    • Please let Ruth know if interested in attending workshop/pre-meeting