2013 Cambridge GOC Scientific Advisory Board Meeting Agenda: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
(30 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:GO SAB Meetings]] | |||
* The morning session will include reports from GO Directors. | * The morning session will include reports from GO Directors. | ||
* GOC community is encouraged to attend the morning session. | * GOC community is encouraged to attend the morning session. | ||
Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
== Morning SAB Meeting (Open) == | == Morning SAB Meeting (Open) == | ||
<u> GOC SAB 2013 </u> | |||
* Gary Bader, University of Toronto | |||
* Matt Hibbs, Trinity University | |||
* John Hogenesch, University of Pennsylvania | |||
* Andrew Su, Scripps Research Institute | |||
* Simon Tavare, University of Cambridge | |||
* Mike Tyers, University of Montreal | |||
=== 8:30AM Introductions and Overview of GOC - Mike === | === 8:30AM Introductions and Overview of GOC - Mike === | ||
* [[Grant Aims and Deliverables]] | * [[Grant Aims and Deliverables]] | ||
=== 9:00AM | === 9:00AM -Annotation - Paul S === | ||
* Handout: Annotation stats | |||
* Handout: Annotation stats | |||
*Community Curation | *Community Curation | ||
** Transcription factor | ** Transcription factor | ||
** CANTO S. pombe (Val) | ** CANTO S. pombe (Val) | ||
*protein2GO transition ( | * Common Annotation tool | ||
* Phylogenetic based - PAINT | ** protein2GO transition (Kimberly) | ||
* Phylogenetic based - PAINT (Paul T.) & JsPaint (Seth) | |||
* Summary: Key Accomplishments & timeline for next steps | * Summary: Key Accomplishments & timeline for next steps | ||
=== | === 10:00am - Ontology domain & modeling extensions - Judy & Paul T === | ||
* Handout: Ontology production stats | |||
* Domain specific development | * Domain specific development | ||
**Crossproducts and ChEBI alignment | |||
**Apoptosis | **Apoptosis | ||
**Cell cycle | **Cell cycle | ||
* Modeling enhancements | * Modeling enhancements | ||
** Transition to OWL | ** Transition to OWL | ||
** Logical definitions ( | ** Logical definitions (TermGenie) | ||
** Annotation Extensions | ** Annotation Extensions | ||
** LEGO | ** LEGO | ||
* Summary: Key Accomplishments & timeline for next steps | |||
=== 11:00 - break === | |||
=== 11:30 - Community Resource - Suzi === | |||
* Handout: usage stats | |||
* GO Mine | |||
* GO Galaxy | |||
* New website prototype | |||
* AmiGO 2 and Solr | |||
* Summary: Key Accomplishments & timeline for next steps | * Summary: Key Accomplishments & timeline for next steps | ||
== 12:30PM -- Private lunch for SAB == | == 12:30PM -- Private lunch for SAB == | ||
== Questions for SAB == | |||
# How much effort should we devote to engaging user community about GO resources and how to most effectively use them? | # How much effort should we devote to engaging user community about GO resources and how to most effectively use them? | ||
# What is appropriate balance between curation of experimental annotations (mostly in MODs) with increased context of specific protein, specific cell type, specific time, and the curation of | # What is appropriate balance between curation of experimental annotations (mostly in MODs) with increased context of specific protein, specific cell type, specific time, and the curation of inferential annotations for all life forms via phylogenetic/comparative approaches? | ||
# What GOC tasks have greatest impact on scientific usability? | # What GOC tasks have greatest impact on scientific usability? | ||
# Is balance of effort between ontology development and knowledge curation and usability appropriate? | # Is balance of effort between ontology development and knowledge curation and usability appropriate? | ||
# How can the LEGO style curation be used most effectively? | |||
# How might we best achieve broad use of the common annotation tool? | |||
# How cam we increase community involvement in ontology development and annotation? | |||
# How to prioritize the families for PAINT curation? | |||
== 1:30PM Discussion: SAB, PIs == | == 1:30PM Discussion: SAB, PIs == | ||
* Summary, Wrap-UP at end of afternoon | * Summary, Wrap-UP at end of afternoon |
Latest revision as of 12:23, 8 April 2014
- The morning session will include reports from GO Directors.
- GOC community is encouraged to attend the morning session.
- SAB will have private catered lunch at 12:30 in the main meeting room.
- Afternoon session will include SAB and GOC Directors and sub-contract PIs
Morning SAB Meeting (Open)
GOC SAB 2013
- Gary Bader, University of Toronto
- Matt Hibbs, Trinity University
- John Hogenesch, University of Pennsylvania
- Andrew Su, Scripps Research Institute
- Simon Tavare, University of Cambridge
- Mike Tyers, University of Montreal
8:30AM Introductions and Overview of GOC - Mike
9:00AM -Annotation - Paul S
- Handout: Annotation stats
- Community Curation
- Transcription factor
- CANTO S. pombe (Val)
- Common Annotation tool
- protein2GO transition (Kimberly)
- Phylogenetic based - PAINT (Paul T.) & JsPaint (Seth)
- Summary: Key Accomplishments & timeline for next steps
10:00am - Ontology domain & modeling extensions - Judy & Paul T
- Handout: Ontology production stats
- Domain specific development
- Crossproducts and ChEBI alignment
- Apoptosis
- Cell cycle
- Modeling enhancements
- Transition to OWL
- Logical definitions (TermGenie)
- Annotation Extensions
- LEGO
- Summary: Key Accomplishments & timeline for next steps
11:00 - break
11:30 - Community Resource - Suzi
- Handout: usage stats
- GO Mine
- GO Galaxy
- New website prototype
- AmiGO 2 and Solr
- Summary: Key Accomplishments & timeline for next steps
12:30PM -- Private lunch for SAB
Questions for SAB
- How much effort should we devote to engaging user community about GO resources and how to most effectively use them?
- What is appropriate balance between curation of experimental annotations (mostly in MODs) with increased context of specific protein, specific cell type, specific time, and the curation of inferential annotations for all life forms via phylogenetic/comparative approaches?
- What GOC tasks have greatest impact on scientific usability?
- Is balance of effort between ontology development and knowledge curation and usability appropriate?
- How can the LEGO style curation be used most effectively?
- How might we best achieve broad use of the common annotation tool?
- How cam we increase community involvement in ontology development and annotation?
- How to prioritize the families for PAINT curation?
1:30PM Discussion: SAB, PIs
- Summary, Wrap-UP at end of afternoon