2016 Geneva GOC Meeting Agenda: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
** Discussion:  15 min
** Discussion:  15 min
****reduce redundancy
****reduce redundancy
****ontology of complexes
****ontology of complexes including macromolecular complexes
 
****what terms in GO and what terms in PRO
* InterPro2GO, Amaia Sangrador, 15 min talk, 5 min discussion, Friday.
* InterPro2GO, Amaia Sangrador, 15 min talk, 5 min discussion, Friday.


* Flash updates on ontology stats and ontology focused projects, Melanie/David OS/Paola, 45 min talk total (among the 3 of us), 15 min discussion, Friday anytime or Saturday morning.
*Community facing stuff
** Flash update on changes to Drupal website (Moni, PaulT)
**Flash update on AmiGO, including work on parallel projectes, e.g. planteome (Seth)
** Flash update on QuickGO (Tony) 10 min
*Noctua Workshop - FRIDAY AFTERNOON
*Noctua Workshop - FRIDAY AFTERNOON
** Protein2GO updates and LEGO/Noctua bridging (Aleksandra)
** Protein2GO updates and LEGO/Noctua bridging (Aleksandra)
** LEGO/Reactome bridging (Seth)
** LEGO/Reactome bridging (Seth)
* *Noctua/LEGO workshop  - Friday afternoon - 3 hours?
** Noctua/LEGO workshop  - Friday afternoon - 3 hours?
** Introduction to the tool using an annotation consistency exercise?
** Introduction to the tool using an annotation consistency exercise?
** Relations used for Biological Process annotations.  In Barcelona, we proposed implementing an additional relation to capture the ambiguity of a gene's relation to a Biological Process.  The implementation never happened, and with GAF outputs of LEGO models, the question becomes even more critical.  It would be good to re-visit this issue, discuss the various proposals that have been made, and see if we still think it's appropriate to add this relation and if so, what steps need to be taken to do it.  (Kimberly - 1 hour?)
** Relations used for Biological Process annotations.  In Barcelona, we proposed implementing an additional relation to capture the ambiguity of a gene's relation to a Biological Process.  The implementation never happened, and with GAF outputs of LEGO models, the question becomes even more critical.  It would be good to re-visit this issue, discuss the various proposals that have been made, and see if we still think it's appropriate to add this relation and if so, what steps need to be taken to do it.  (Kimberly - 1 hour?)
====Saturday====
* Flash updates on ontology stats and ontology focused projects, Melanie/David OS/Paola, 45 min talk total (among the 3 of us), 15 min discussion, Friday anytime or Saturday morning.
* Community facing stuff
** Flash update on changes to Drupal website (Moni, PaulT)
**Flash update on AmiGO, including work on parallel projectes, e.g. planteome (Seth)
** Flash update on QuickGO (Tony) 10 min


*Addressing curation redundancy (http://jira.geneontology.org/browse/GO-1131) (Val?)
*Addressing curation redundancy (http://jira.geneontology.org/browse/GO-1131) (Val?)

Revision as of 11:25, 6 April 2016

Suggested Agenda Items

Please suggest Agenda items here, and these will later be arranged into the time slots below. Please list topic, name of speaker, estimated time for talk plus discussion, and requested day.

List of suggested items

Friday

  • Annotation
    • Annotation of protein complexes, Sandra Orchard, IntACT, 10 min talk
    • Annotation of protein complexes, Ceci Arighi, PRO, 10 min talk
    • Discussion: 15 min
        • reduce redundancy
        • ontology of complexes including macromolecular complexes
        • what terms in GO and what terms in PRO
  • InterPro2GO, Amaia Sangrador, 15 min talk, 5 min discussion, Friday.
  • Noctua Workshop - FRIDAY AFTERNOON
    • Protein2GO updates and LEGO/Noctua bridging (Aleksandra)
    • LEGO/Reactome bridging (Seth)
    • Noctua/LEGO workshop - Friday afternoon - 3 hours?
    • Introduction to the tool using an annotation consistency exercise?
    • Relations used for Biological Process annotations. In Barcelona, we proposed implementing an additional relation to capture the ambiguity of a gene's relation to a Biological Process. The implementation never happened, and with GAF outputs of LEGO models, the question becomes even more critical. It would be good to re-visit this issue, discuss the various proposals that have been made, and see if we still think it's appropriate to add this relation and if so, what steps need to be taken to do it. (Kimberly - 1 hour?)

Saturday

  • Flash updates on ontology stats and ontology focused projects, Melanie/David OS/Paola, 45 min talk total (among the 3 of us), 15 min discussion, Friday anytime or Saturday morning.
  • Community facing stuff
    • Flash update on changes to Drupal website (Moni, PaulT)
    • Flash update on AmiGO, including work on parallel projectes, e.g. planteome (Seth)
    • Flash update on QuickGO (Tony) 10 min


  • Synapse project update (David OS, Paul T, Ruth L)
  • Making automation automatic - rationalising the inference pipeline (David OS)

Planned Schedule for the Week of the Meeting

GOC-Geneva-2016 Meeting schedule

  • Friday April 15 and Saturday April 16 - GOC Meeting:
  • Meeting location:
  • April 15: 9am to 5pm
  • April 16: 9am to 1pm
  • Saturday April 16 - GOC Steering Committee Meeting:
  • Meeting location:

GOC-Geneva-2016 Meeting Dinner

  • April 15
  • Location:
  • Time:

Minutes

The Minutes of the GOC-Geneva-2016 Meeting are recorded here.


Agenda

Please ensure that all outstanding items from the Trello board are covered here and under the appropriate heading.


Day 1 (Friday)

Session name (approx. times)

  • Item (speaker) (approx time)

Protein Ontology representatives will be present

Group Photo

Day 2

Session name (approx. times)

  • Item (speaker) (approx time)


Wrap-up

  • Review action items