2017 Cambridge GOC Meeting Agenda: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
'''This is a placeholder for now''' | '''This is a placeholder for now''' | ||
* GitHub tutorial (Seth & Pascale): how GO now uses GitHub for project management and guidelines for contributors | * GitHub tutorial (Seth & Pascale): how GO now uses GitHub for project management and guidelines for contributors | ||
* What do users want? (Judy) | |||
**truth (summary/story/model)? | |||
**fishing expeditions? | |||
**api access? | |||
* Who are our users? (Judy) | |||
**geneticists? | |||
**clinicians? | |||
**computational biologists? | |||
[[Category: GO Consortium Meetings]] | [[Category: GO Consortium Meetings]] | ||
Revision as of 11:04, 24 August 2017
GOC Meeting, Cambridge , October 2-4, 2017
Agenda
Monday 2nd October
- report from PIs about progression of AGR
- Evening: Poster session
Tuesday 3rd October
Wednesday 4th October
Hands-on/Workshop Suggestions
- Creating a biologically useful slim (complete coverage by aspect, biologically useful terms i.e sufficient granularity, avoiding single step process terms (i.e functions), different slims for different purposes.
- Displaying GO annotations (non redundantly, in MODs, in AmiGO), general data presentation.
- Good annotation practice: phenotype vs process,
- Representing biologists’ view of biology: author intent & protein domains; IDA v IC v New evidence code
GOC meeting Discussion topics
This is a placeholder for now
- GitHub tutorial (Seth & Pascale): how GO now uses GitHub for project management and guidelines for contributors
- What do users want? (Judy)
- truth (summary/story/model)?
- fishing expeditions?
- api access?
- Who are our users? (Judy)
- geneticists?
- clinicians?
- computational biologists?