2018 NYU SAB Meeting Agenda: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
** Developer community: R packages for GO (technical outreach) | ** Developer community: R packages for GO (technical outreach) | ||
** Draft some best practices for the developer community | ** Draft some best practices for the developer community | ||
** Best practices document for using GO, including GO enrichment (Paul) | |||
** Suggestion to have a “Certified GO tool developer” program with badges (not implement but what do people think ? can we also do that for curators? | ** Suggestion to have a “Certified GO tool developer” program with badges (not implement but what do people think ? can we also do that for curators? | ||
** Can GO partner with other enrichment tools beyond panther? | ** Can GO partner with other enrichment tools beyond panther? |
Revision as of 14:27, 21 March 2018
date: July 15, 2018
TO DO
- Go over last SAB report, make sure we've addressed everything
- What materials do we need to prepare in advance ?
- Update on priorities/progress
- Metrics of our accomplishments
- Are there any specific questions we have for the SAB?
What we'd like to show
- Noctua 1.0: demo, show groups using it
Important points from the 2015 SAB report
- Organization of the GOC
- Goals
- GOC projects and resources
- QA group
- Tools:
- PAINT
- Noctua
- Capella: paper viewer tool
- Broader community initiatives
- Developer community: R packages for GO (technical outreach)
- Draft some best practices for the developer community
- Best practices document for using GO, including GO enrichment (Paul)
- Suggestion to have a “Certified GO tool developer” program with badges (not implement but what do people think ? can we also do that for curators?
- Can GO partner with other enrichment tools beyond panther?
- Make GO data available via web services to help people keep their data up to date (ongoing)
- What is the future of https://github.com/cmungall/term-enrichment-protocol for standardizing among various enrichment tools? (not updated since 2014)
- Provide geneontology.org progress/usage metrics, particularly usage of enrichment analysis and compare to DAVID stats - see 2017 progress report
- Outreach group
Questions we'd like to ask
- Should we push out GO-CAMs into pathway databases like pathwaycommons, ndex, ...?