21 SEPT 2010 RefGen Priorities Discussion (Archived)

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Strategy to achieve broad coverage of genomes annotation

A. Systematic Curation of all PANTHER families

Strategies to prioritize

  • Annotate all families where there is no annotations or just ND's (automatic?)
  • Annotate all families already 'done' by MODs (431 families done until the lung project)


B. Curation by biological domain

Strategies to prioritize

See document from Emily and Pascale - Nov-Dec 2009 : GO textbook approach for annotation

C. Goal

  • Paul: Suggestion : have some extra resources between now and December to do more tree curation.
  • Kara: Mike could try 'fast pass' all next week, and get a better estimate as to how much time he needs to do it at a 'production' pace.
  • Paul: do only cellular processes: see OBO file in PantherDB

Discussion and suggestions:

  • Mike C: goals for the next 2 months have different impact from goals for the rest of the funding period
  • Paul: We should generate stats for the grant to show proof of principle for the grant
    • Factors to consider:
      1. How much EXP data we we have to work with ? The 431 families have more EXP data to work from
      2. Fast pass versus comprehensive annotation of trees?
    • Kara: what if we only did BP and not MF?