2 Mar 2021 PAINT Conference Call: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "==Present== * (Need to look at previous agenda for actin items/leftover topics) * Pascale: unable to save PTHR13723 with many NOTs https://github.com/geneontology/go-annot...")
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:




* (Need to look at previous agenda for actin items/leftover topics)
===Curation priority/need review status===
The discussion can be found in the email trail from Feb 10-14 with subject "PAINT migration "requires review" logic". Discussion points:


* We will only keep the "require review" status created during the 14 to 15 migration, and erase the rest.
* In the future, we will have more explicit messages for the review. For annual migration, there are three situations that will trigger a require review status.
**Families with nodes that cannot be mapped from previous library to new library
**Forward-tracked nodes changed families. Curation status goes to the new family, not the old family (since it may have been dropped)
**Families with annotations forward-tracked to child nodes
* Need to decide about the monthly updates.


===Plan to migrate PAINT to PANTHER 16===
There was a suggestion to skip it due to the error in Xenopus tropicalis genome from UniProt.
===GitHub tickets===
* Pascale: unable to save PTHR13723 with many NOTs https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/3296
* Pascale: unable to save PTHR13723 with many NOTs https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/3296
* From same ticket: Steven mentions getting no answer in the Panther tracker - can we make sure to answer people?  
* From same ticket: Steven mentions getting no answer in the Panther tracker - can we make sure to answer people?  
===Improve annotation forward tracking===
This is a topic we discussed at the last call. Sometimes nodes are not tracked between PANTHER builds due to the current rules. Huaiyu has proposal to improve the rules, and will discuss here.


[[Category:PAINT]]
[[Category:PAINT]]

Revision as of 15:53, 1 March 2021

Present

Curation priority/need review status

The discussion can be found in the email trail from Feb 10-14 with subject "PAINT migration "requires review" logic". Discussion points:

  • We will only keep the "require review" status created during the 14 to 15 migration, and erase the rest.
  • In the future, we will have more explicit messages for the review. For annual migration, there are three situations that will trigger a require review status.
    • Families with nodes that cannot be mapped from previous library to new library
    • Forward-tracked nodes changed families. Curation status goes to the new family, not the old family (since it may have been dropped)
    • Families with annotations forward-tracked to child nodes
  • Need to decide about the monthly updates.

Plan to migrate PAINT to PANTHER 16

There was a suggestion to skip it due to the error in Xenopus tropicalis genome from UniProt.

GitHub tickets

Improve annotation forward tracking

This is a topic we discussed at the last call. Sometimes nodes are not tracked between PANTHER builds due to the current rules. Huaiyu has proposal to improve the rules, and will discuss here.