2 Mar 2021 PAINT Conference Call

From GO Wiki
Revision as of 15:57, 1 March 2021 by Mi (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Present

Curation priority/need review status

The discussion can be found in the email trail from Feb 10-14 with subject "PAINT migration "requires review" logic". Discussion points:

  • We will only keep the "require review" status created during the 14 to 15 migration, and erase the rest.
  • In the future, we will have more explicit messages for the review. For annual migration, there are three situations that will trigger a require review status.
    • Families with nodes that cannot be mapped from previous library to new library. Such families will require recuration.
    • Forward-tracked nodes changed families. Curation status goes to the new family, not the old family (since it may have been dropped). The review is to check whether the annotation can be propagated tp an ancestral node or to a more specific term, etc.
    • Families with annotations forward-tracked to child nodes. Review if the annotation can be propagated to an ancestral term.
  • Need to decide about the monthly updates.

Plan to migrate PAINT to PANTHER 16

There was a suggestion to skip it due to the error in Xenopus tropicalis genome from UniProt.

GitHub tickets

Improve annotation forward tracking

This is a topic we discussed at the last call. Sometimes nodes are not tracked between PANTHER builds due to the current rules. Huaiyu has proposal to improve the rules, and will discuss here.