Annotation 17May10: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '==Items for discussion== * Discuss Roadmap for Annotation Advocacy group (rama) * Evidence code ECO proposal- who should take the initiative to move this forward (Rama) * Annotat…')
 
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
* Annotations from inter-ontology links-follow up with Chris/T/D (Rama)
* Annotations from inter-ontology links-follow up with Chris/T/D (Rama)
* How are we progressing in terms of QC checks?
* How are we progressing in terms of QC checks?
- GO:0005515
**GO:0005515
- there are other 'easy' ones - IEP for function
**there are other 'easy' ones - IEP for function
* Annotation to protein complexes: Thinking about this more, it occurred to me that the annnotation object (column 2) should NOT be the PC ID. Protein complexes should be handled like isoforms, and be put in column 17. Does that make sense?
* Annotation to protein complexes: Thinking about this more, it occurred to me that the annnotation object (column 2) should NOT be the PC ID. Protein complexes should be handled like isoforms, and be put in column 17. Does that make sense?

Revision as of 17:53, 13 May 2010

Items for discussion

  • Discuss Roadmap for Annotation Advocacy group (rama)
  • Evidence code ECO proposal- who should take the initiative to move this forward (Rama)
  • Annotations from inter-ontology links-follow up with Chris/T/D (Rama)
  • How are we progressing in terms of QC checks?
    • GO:0005515
    • there are other 'easy' ones - IEP for function
  • Annotation to protein complexes: Thinking about this more, it occurred to me that the annnotation object (column 2) should NOT be the PC ID. Protein complexes should be handled like isoforms, and be put in column 17. Does that make sense?