Annotation Call July 22 2014: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " ==Agenda== ===Col-16 Questions=== PMID: 11486005 ** Snf1 requires Snf4 for full kinase activity - it's unclear how Snf4 contributes to full Snf1 activity) is_regulated_by is...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===Col-16 Questions=== | ===Col-16 Questions=== | ||
PMID: 11486005 | * PMID: 11486005 | ||
** Snf1 requires Snf4 for full kinase activity - it's unclear how Snf4 contributes to full Snf1 activity) is_regulated_by is not allowed any more. In this case I could use in_presence_of or dependent_on. Which one is correct? | ** Snf1 requires Snf4 for full kinase activity - it's unclear how Snf4 contributes to full Snf1 activity) is_regulated_by is not allowed any more. In this case I could use in_presence_of or dependent_on. Which one is correct? | ||
Revision as of 13:56, 11 July 2014
Agenda
Col-16 Questions
- PMID: 11486005
- Snf1 requires Snf4 for full kinase activity - it's unclear how Snf4 contributes to full Snf1 activity) is_regulated_by is not allowed any more. In this case I could use in_presence_of or dependent_on. Which one is correct?
- Snf1 doesn't phosphorylate Mig1 during during salt stress) not_happens_during is not an option any more. What is the correct relationship for this? independent_of doesn't seem right
- PMID: 15652479
- Ste20 localization_dependent_on ?
rehousing annotations to Cell cycle phase term
We are trying a new approach to help groups rehouse annotations. We will deal with one term at a time. Highlight what the issues are etc so the groups can focus and not be overwhelmed. We can also highlight this term on the GOC website (why we can't have direct anotations to this term etc).
Cell cycle phase should not be used any more for manual annotations.