Annotation Call July 8, 2014: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "==Agenda== ===New QC checks=== * Reference field For each annotation, should there be either a PMID or a GO_REF as reference, with option to have an internal MOD reference i...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 15:43, 4 July 2014
Agenda
New QC checks
- Reference field
For each annotation, should there be either a PMID or a GO_REF as reference, with option to have an internal MOD reference in addition? i.e. it shouldn't be allowed to have an internal reference alone. There doesn't appear to be a hard check on this.
E.g. Gramene have thousands of annotations using an RCA evidence code and an internal Gramene reference, e.g.
GR_protein B8A749 OsI_01599 GO:0005739 GR_REF:7047 RCA C Putative uncharacterized protein protein taxon:39946 20090810 GR
The reference is detailed here; http://archive.gramene.org/db/literature/pub_search?ref_id=7047
GR_protein Q947Z9 OSJNBa0050M22.8 GO:0004252 GR_REF:8030 RCA InterPro:IPR000209 F Putative retroelement protein taxon:39947 20090212 GR
http://archive.gramene.org/db/literature/pub_search?ref_id=8030
- RCA evidence
Annotations made with RCA also have a 1 year shelf life. Groups should update the date or remove the annotations after the one year limit.
New Website
The new website went live last Thur. We encourage all of you to get accounts and get familiar with the site, how to edit etc.