Annotation Conf. Call, July 28, 2015: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Example papers) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
===Example papers=== | ===Example papers=== | ||
Obsoleted relationship: | Obsoleted relationship:<br /> | ||
independent_of | independent_of <br /> | ||
PMID:25215947 | PMID:25215947<br /> | ||
Typically mitophagy is dependent on PARK2 / parkin (Uniprot O60260). However, in PMID:25215947, authors show that AMBRA1 (Q9C0C7) (in presence of chemical inducers of mitochondrial depolarisation such as FCCP) initiates mitophagy independent of PARK2 / parkin. | Typically mitophagy is dependent on PARK2 / parkin (Uniprot O60260). However, in PMID:25215947, authors show that AMBRA1 (Q9C0C7) (in presence of chemical inducers of mitochondrial depolarisation such as FCCP) initiates mitophagy independent of PARK2 / parkin. | ||
What to do now that independent_of relation is obsoleted? Simplest to create new term instead? e.g. “parkin-independent mitophagy in response to mitochondrial depolarization”. | What to do now that independent_of relation is obsoleted? Simplest to create new term instead? e.g. “parkin-independent mitophagy in response to mitochondrial depolarization”. |
Revision as of 10:31, 21 July 2015
Agenda
Overview by ontology editors
Why certain relations were going to be obsoleted
Example papers
Obsoleted relationship:
independent_of
PMID:25215947
Typically mitophagy is dependent on PARK2 / parkin (Uniprot O60260). However, in PMID:25215947, authors show that AMBRA1 (Q9C0C7) (in presence of chemical inducers of mitochondrial depolarisation such as FCCP) initiates mitophagy independent of PARK2 / parkin.
What to do now that independent_of relation is obsoleted? Simplest to create new term instead? e.g. “parkin-independent mitophagy in response to mitochondrial depolarization”.