Annotation Conf. Call, March 25, 2014: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 37: Line 37:
==Discussion==
==Discussion==
===E2/E3===
===E2/E3===
Mike went through his powerpoint presentation (available on the SF ticket).
Mike went through his powerpoint presentation (available on the SF ticket). There are three reactions, but only two terms available with GO:4842 being used for E2 and E3. Also GO:4842 has ATP hydrolysis as part of the definition while ATP is not required.  
Obvious issues being GO:4842 has ATP hydrolysis as part of the definition while ATP is not required.  
Questions: <br>
Questions: <br>
* move E2 and E3 under transferase activity (they are transfering UB and to be a ligase you need ATP hydrolysis)
* move E2 and E3 under transferase activity (they are transfering UB and to be a ligase you need ATP hydrolysis)

Revision as of 17:13, 25 March 2014

Agenda

Present:
SGD: Rama,Paul, Diane, Edith
MGI: David, Judy Li
Dicty: Pascake
WB: Kimberly
Pombase: Midori
UCL: Ruth, Paul, Ana
EBI: Rachael, Jane, Aleks, Susan, Paola
Berkeley: Chris, Suzi
Reactome: Peter
RGD: Stan

E2/E3 SF ticket

http://sourceforge.net/p/geneontology/ontology-requests/10635/

We will talk about the changes being proposed. Interesting papers:
Overview: http://jcs.biologists.org/content/125/3/531.full
SCF UbLigase RING finger type: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079610799000103?via=ihub

GOC meeting report

Discussion

E2/E3

Mike went through his powerpoint presentation (available on the SF ticket). There are three reactions, but only two terms available with GO:4842 being used for E2 and E3. Also GO:4842 has ATP hydrolysis as part of the definition while ATP is not required. Questions:

  • move E2 and E3 under transferase activity (they are transfering UB and to be a ligase you need ATP hydrolysis)
  • we need separate terms for E2 and E3 when the functions are distinct and one term when the activity is combined
  • we don't have a term for the complex function of E2 and E3 (combined activity). We could create a new term for this complex function and use has_part to relate the E2 function
  • Ruth: Can you create the new terms without obsoleting the old ones so we know how it works? We should let Interpro do the mapping and use that as a guide to remap manual annotations.
  • David will mockup the proposed changes, send it around before he commits it.

GOC report

  • regarding complex portal, please contact Sandra if you want access to their editor (curator interface) to add complexes.