Annotation Conf. Call, November 27, 2012

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Agenda

  • Annotating to 'part' terms (nuclear_part, etc)(Jane)
    • Logically, the x-part terms are equivalent to their x counterparts for the purposes of standard GO annotation (i.e. without additional qualifiers).
    • We will add the part terms to the 'high-level terms not for annotation' category. Groups should therefore be prepared to migrate their annotations. We will send out an announcement.
    • We may retire these terms in the future at our discretion.
    • We are open to additional qualifiers to distinguish found-throughout vs found-in-some-part-of.
  • GAF check reports (Jenkins)-Chris
    • http://build.berkeleybop.org/view/GAF
    • The Jenkins Rule engine generates a report using all the documented QC checks (http://www.geneontology.org/GO.annotation_qc.shtml)
    • This rule engine flags both soft and hard checks.
    • Many of the errors are coming from GO_AR:0000014 "Valid GO term ID". Mike's script filters these out and we are doing a disservice to users by not loading into AmiGO.
    • Proposal is to fix them automatically where possibly (merges, obsolete terms where an automatic repair is possible).
  • Cardinality of Col-17 (Kimberley, Rama)
    • a paper shows SH3 domain binding for two out of three possible protein isoforms for a C. elegans gene. Can we put both IDs in one row (separated by|)? But Cardinality of col-17 is 0 or 1. Can cardinality be 0 or greater?
Retrieved from "https://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php?title=Annotation_Conf._Call,_November_27,_2012&oldid=49630"