Annotation Conf. Call 2017-01-10: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
***[https://github.com/geneontology/go-site/issues/267 Jenkins GAF checks with red status cannot be inspected] | ***[https://github.com/geneontology/go-site/issues/267 Jenkins GAF checks with red status cannot be inspected] | ||
***[https://github.com/geneontology/go-site/issues/123 GOA annotation checks on GAFs are more stringent than Jenkins checks (should be same?)] | ***[https://github.com/geneontology/go-site/issues/123 GOA annotation checks on GAFs are more stringent than Jenkins checks (should be same?)] | ||
*Inferred | *Inferred annotations (annotations created by logical inference) | ||
**Inter-ontology links | **Inter-ontology links | ||
***Source: GOC | ***Source: GOC | ||
***[https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1336 PomBase inferred GAF missing annotations] | ***[https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1336 PomBase inferred GAF missing annotations] | ||
***[https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/12859 Remove all single-step BP classes] | ***[https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/12859 Remove all single-step BP classes] | ||
**Annotations inferred from annotation extensions | **Annotations inferred from annotation extensions (fold-based predictions) | ||
***Source: GOC-OWL | ***Source: GOC-OWL | ||
***[https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1487 GOC-OWL inference pipeline concerns] | ***[https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1487 GOC-OWL inference pipeline concerns] |
Revision as of 16:36, 5 January 2017
Bluejeans
- https://bluejeans.com/993661940
- to join via phone: enter Meeting ID 993661940 after dialing in
- from US: +1.408.740.7256 or +1.888.240.2560
- from UK: +44.203.608.5256
- from Switzerland: +41.81.588.0256
Agenda
Review of Jenkins Pipeline
- GAF checks
- Inferred annotations (annotations created by logical inference)
- Inter-ontology links
- Annotations inferred from annotation extensions (fold-based predictions)
- Evidence Codes used for Inferred Annotations
Working Groups
- At the November 2016 USC meeting, we agreed to establish working groups for several topics.
- If they haven't already, groups need to set up meeting schedule and agendas
- Annotation Guidelines for High Throughput Experiments
- Helen Attrill (FB)
- Stacia Engel (SGD)
- Pascale Gaudet (SIB)
- Ruth Lovering (UCL)
- Kimberly Van Auken (WB)
- Working group to finalize transcription decision tree
- Marcio Acencio (NTNU)
- Karen Christie (MGI)
- Rachael Huntely (UCL)
- Working group to review use of ECO codes
- David Hill (MGI)
- Note also that there is an ECO workshop at this year's ISB meeting
- Annotation Guidelines for High Throughput Experiments