Annotation Conf. Call 2017-08-08: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
== Ontology Report == | == Ontology Report == | ||
=== Check Annotations === | |||
*SUMO protease annotations may be too generic https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/13941 | *SUMO protease annotations may be too generic https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/13941 | ||
**Annotations to SUMO protease terms may be able to be deepened to one of the two more specific SUMO protease terms (endopeptidase or isopeptidase) | **Annotations to SUMO protease terms may be able to be deepened to one of the two more specific SUMO protease terms (endopeptidase or isopeptidase) | ||
Line 43: | Line 44: | ||
**Confirm that all AGR member groups are okay with current version of GO AGR slim | **Confirm that all AGR member groups are okay with current version of GO AGR slim | ||
**Doug had suggested including additional bins for: | **Doug had suggested including additional bins for: | ||
***Genes not mapped to any term in the slim | ***Genes not mapped to any term in the slim (other) | ||
***Genes not annotated to any term | ****It can be very difficult to try to map all genes to a slim term - you want to have biologically meaningful term selection without including terms that are too high level or too specific | ||
***Genes not annotated to any term at all | |||
[[Category: Annotation Working Group]] | [[Category: Annotation Working Group]] |
Revision as of 11:17, 8 August 2017
Meeting URL
Agenda
Ontology Report
- SUMO protease annotations may be too generic https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/13941
- GOC slim ticket https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/13996
- Modification to AGR slim
- Confirm that all AGR member groups are okay with current version of GO AGR slim
Signaling Project
- Update on progress to date, github tickets
- Wnt - Giulia, Helen, Kimberly
- MAPK - David H. and Sabrina
- Examining gene products annotated to the process with no experimental support for known MFs
- Thinking about how to define the beginning and parts of the pathway
- Ca2+ Signaling
- Fertilization - Penelope
- GPCR - Pascale, Petra
- Some ontology tickets have been addressed
- Needs global annotation review
- Needs GO-CAM model
- Reminder - discussion on specific github tickets, not on project page
Minutes
- On call: David H., Harold, Helen, Kevin, Kimberly, Li, Liz, Midori, Moni, Pascale, Penelope, Rob, Sabrina, Sage, Shur-Jen, Stan, Suzi, Terry, Val, Stacia
Ontology Report
Check Annotations
- SUMO protease annotations may be too generic https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/13941
- Annotations to SUMO protease terms may be able to be deepened to one of the two more specific SUMO protease terms (endopeptidase or isopeptidase)
- Gene products annotated are listed on the github ticket
GO Slims
- GOC slim ticket https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/13996
- Mary will use her algorithmic method, but the output slim will need review from GOC member groups
- Val's matrix tool can be a good tool for checking redundancy in the slim
- Will also address whether the chosen terms are too high level to be useful
- AI: Document the methodologies used to create and analyze slims
- AI: Supply list of GO IDs used for GO slims (make new github ticket)
- Supply ID - Name pairs
- Modification to AGR slim
- Confirm that all AGR member groups are okay with current version of GO AGR slim
- Doug had suggested including additional bins for:
- Genes not mapped to any term in the slim (other)
- It can be very difficult to try to map all genes to a slim term - you want to have biologically meaningful term selection without including terms that are too high level or too specific
- Genes not annotated to any term at all
- Genes not mapped to any term in the slim (other)