Annotation Conf. Call 2017-08-08

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Meeting URL

Agenda

Ontology Report

Signaling Project

  • Update on progress to date, github tickets
    • Wnt - Giulia, Helen, Kimberly
    • MAPK - David H. and Sabrina
      • Examining gene products annotated to the process with no experimental support for known MFs
      • Thinking about how to define the beginning and parts of the pathway
    • Ca2+ Signaling
      • Fertilization - Penelope
    • GPCR - Pascale, Petra
      • Some ontology tickets have been addressed
      • Needs global annotation review
      • Needs GO-CAM model
    • Reminder - discussion on specific github tickets, not on project page

Minutes

  • On call: David H., Harold, Helen, Kevin, Kimberly, Li, Liz, Midori, Moni, Pascale, Penelope, Rob, Sabrina, Sage, Shur-Jen, Stan, Suzi, Terry, Val, Stacia

Ontology Report

Check Annotations

  • SUMO protease annotations may be too generic https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/13941
    • Annotations to SUMO protease terms may be able to be deepened to one of the two more specific SUMO protease terms (endopeptidase or isopeptidase)
    • Gene products annotated are listed on the github ticket

GO Slims

  • GOC slim ticket https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/13996
    • Mary will use her algorithmic method, but the output slim will need review from GOC member groups
    • Val's matrix tool can be a good tool for checking redundancy in the slim
      • Will also address whether the chosen terms are too high level to be useful
  • AI: Document the methodologies used to create and analyze slims
  • AI: Supply list of GO IDs used for GO slims (make new github ticket)
    • Supply ID - Name pairs
  • Modification to AGR slim
    • Confirm that all AGR member groups are okay with current version of GO AGR slim
    • Doug had suggested including additional bins for:
      • Genes not mapped to any term in the slim (other)
        • It can be very difficult to try to map all genes to a slim term - you want to have biologically meaningful term selection without including terms that are too high level or too specific
      • Genes not annotated to any term at all