Annotation Conf. Call 2018-03-13: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
*Once review is done, please remove yourself from the assignee list AND record the action in the accompanying Google spreadsheet linked from the github ticket | *Once review is done, please remove yourself from the assignee list AND record the action in the accompanying Google spreadsheet linked from the github ticket | ||
*[https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1FDfp4yXlLZjrcB0NIbsAgUukDWDwhJe_ Spreadsheet on GO Annotation Google drive with specific annotations, suggestions] | *[https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1FDfp4yXlLZjrcB0NIbsAgUukDWDwhJe_ Spreadsheet on GO Annotation Google drive with specific annotations, suggestions] | ||
* | *Tickets to review: | ||
**[https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1746 Review annotations to palate development] | **[https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1746 Review annotations to palate development] | ||
* | ***14 annotations left (BHF-UCL) | ||
**[https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1293 Review annotations to mRNA cleavage] | **[https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1293 Review annotations to mRNA cleavage] | ||
***1 annotation left (SWIP) | |||
== Annotation Requests == | == Annotation Requests == |
Revision as of 08:53, 13 March 2018
Agenda
GOC Meeting, NYU, New York, NY, May 12-14th
- Reminder to register, and reserve your hotel room before April 6th if staying at the Shelburne NYC
- Logistics
- Agenda
20th Anniversary GO Meeting, Montreal, CA
- Dates set for Oct 17-20
HTP Annotation Guidelines
- Helen has added documentation on the use of HTP evidence codes to the wiki:
- Guide to GO Evidence Codes
- Annotation standards for HTP proteomics experiments
- How best to capture the combination of a published paper's experiment combined with secondary curator evaluation using some other methodology? New combinatorial evidence code and paper plus a GO reference? (This would be a change to our reference practice.)
- Review RCA evidence code - Please can the groups listed below review their RCA annotations and decide if they'd still like to keep them and if RCA is still the appropriate evidence code?
- TAIR
- MGI
- SGD
- RGD
- CAFA
Annotation Review
- Annotation review is being driven by annotation QC and ontology development
- Goal here is for correct and consistent annotation
- Prioritize by:
- Annotations that are incorrect
- Annotations to terms that are being made obsolete or updated in the ontology
- Annotations to high level terms that are not informative
- Annotations to grouping terms for which more granular, informative terms exist (maybe weren't found initially or were created after the annotation was made)
- Prioritize by:
- Tickets are created in the geneontology/go-annotation repo on github
- Currently, 59 open tickets labeled with Annotation Review in geneontology/go-annotation
- Tickets are assigned to representatives of the annotation groups that need to perform the review
- Once review is done, please remove yourself from the assignee list AND record the action in the accompanying Google spreadsheet linked from the github ticket
- Spreadsheet on GO Annotation Google drive with specific annotations, suggestions
- Tickets to review:
- Review annotations to palate development
- 14 annotations left (BHF-UCL)
- Review annotations to mRNA cleavage
- 1 annotation left (SWIP)
- Review annotations to palate development
Annotation Requests
- There are some tickets in geneontology/go-annotation that are requesting annotation
- We'd like to assign these to groups
Minutes
- On call: