Annotation Conf. Call 2018-03-13: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
***RGD
***RGD
***CAFA
***CAFA
== UniProt vs UniProtKB ==
*UniProt = contributed by
*UniProtKB = annotated entities
*This ticket is still open - are we just waiting for groups to have their software team implement and the changes to make their way to the GO website?
*Is everyone also using UniProtKB as a prefix in the With/From field?


== Annotation Review ==
== Annotation Review ==
Line 49: Line 55:
*We'd like to assign these to groups
*We'd like to assign these to groups
**[https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1326 Annotating yeast autophagy regulators in PMID:25660547 ?]
**[https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1326 Annotating yeast autophagy regulators in PMID:25660547 ?]
== GO-CAM/Noctua ==
*Next call tomorrow, Wednesday, March 14th at 11:00am EDT (see Google calendar)
== Protein Complexes Working Group ==
*Next call this Thursday, March 15th at 10:30am EDT (see Google calendar)


= Minutes =  
= Minutes =  

Revision as of 09:06, 13 March 2018

Agenda

GOC Meeting, NYU, New York, NY, May 12-14th

  • Reminder to register, and reserve your hotel room before April 6th if staying at the Shelburne NYC
  • Logistics
  • Agenda

20th Anniversary GO Meeting, Montreal, CA

  • Dates set for Oct 17-20

HTP Annotation Guidelines

  • Helen has added documentation on the use of HTP evidence codes to the wiki:
    • Guide to GO Evidence Codes
    • Annotation standards for HTP proteomics experiments
      • How best to capture the combination of a published paper's experiment combined with secondary curator evaluation using some other methodology? New combinatorial evidence code and paper plus a GO reference? (This would be a change to our reference practice.)
    • Review RCA evidence code - Please can the groups listed below review their RCA annotations and decide if they'd still like to keep them and if RCA is still the appropriate evidence code?
      • TAIR
      • MGI
      • SGD
      • RGD
      • CAFA

UniProt vs UniProtKB

  • UniProt = contributed by
  • UniProtKB = annotated entities
  • This ticket is still open - are we just waiting for groups to have their software team implement and the changes to make their way to the GO website?
  • Is everyone also using UniProtKB as a prefix in the With/From field?

Annotation Review

  • Annotation review is being driven by annotation QC and ontology development
  • Goal here is for correct and consistent annotation
    • Prioritize by:
      • Annotations that are incorrect
      • Annotations to terms that are being made obsolete or updated in the ontology
      • Annotations to high level terms that are not informative
      • Annotations to grouping terms for which more granular, informative terms exist (maybe weren't found initially or were created after the annotation was made)
  • Tickets are created in the geneontology/go-annotation repo on github
  • Currently, 59 open tickets labeled with Annotation Review in geneontology/go-annotation
  • Tickets are assigned to representatives of the annotation groups that need to perform the review
  • Once review is done, please remove yourself from the assignee list AND record the action in the accompanying Google spreadsheet linked from the github ticket
  • Spreadsheet on GO Annotation Google drive with specific annotations, suggestions
  • Tickets to review:

Annotation Requests

GO-CAM/Noctua

  • Next call tomorrow, Wednesday, March 14th at 11:00am EDT (see Google calendar)

Protein Complexes Working Group

  • Next call this Thursday, March 15th at 10:30am EDT (see Google calendar)

Minutes

  • On call:
Retrieved from "https://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php?title=Annotation_Conf._Call_2018-03-13&oldid=67896"