Annotation Conf. Call 2018-03-27: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Evidence Codes == | == Evidence Codes == | ||
*[https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1801 Review RCA evidence code] - Please can the groups listed below review their RCA annotations and decide if they'd still like to keep them and if RCA is still the appropriate evidence code? | |||
** | **Thank you to everyone who has reviewed their existing RCA annotations. | ||
** | **Many RCA annotations were removed, but some groups are keeping annotations from papers that use methodology consistent with the definition of RCA. | ||
** | **Remaining groups will be contacted individually. | ||
** | **Since these annotations come from papers, the originally proposed one-year restriction does not make sense and will not be an annotation rule. | ||
** | **That said, periodic annotation review is always a good idea. | ||
= Minutes = | = Minutes = |
Revision as of 15:58, 26 March 2018
Agenda
GOC Meeting, NYU, New York, NY, May 12-14th
- Reminder to register, and reserve your hotel room before April 6th if staying at the Shelburne NYC
- Logistics
- Agenda
20th Anniversary GO Meeting, Montreal, CA
- Dates set for Oct 17-20
Updates on Projects
Evidence Codes
- Review RCA evidence code - Please can the groups listed below review their RCA annotations and decide if they'd still like to keep them and if RCA is still the appropriate evidence code?
- Thank you to everyone who has reviewed their existing RCA annotations.
- Many RCA annotations were removed, but some groups are keeping annotations from papers that use methodology consistent with the definition of RCA.
- Remaining groups will be contacted individually.
- Since these annotations come from papers, the originally proposed one-year restriction does not make sense and will not be an annotation rule.
- That said, periodic annotation review is always a good idea.
Minutes
- On call: