Difference between revisions of "Annotation Conf. Call 2018-08-14"

From GO Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(GO Conference Calls)
m (PAINT Annotations)
Line 36: Line 36:
  
 
=== PAINT Annotations ===
 
=== PAINT Annotations ===
 +
*Refresher on how PAINT annotations are created
 
*[https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/2042 Doubled up IBA+EXP annotations (from Karen Christie)]
 
*[https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/2042 Doubled up IBA+EXP annotations (from Karen Christie)]
 
*[https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/2049 PAINT:circular transfer of annotations]
 
*[https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/2049 PAINT:circular transfer of annotations]

Revision as of 06:38, 14 August 2018

Meeting URL

Montreal Meeting, October Wednesday, 17th - Friday, 19th

GO Conference Calls

Tuesdays

  • Still will be Tuesdays at 8am PDT
  • Proposed meeting schedule:
    • 1st Tuesday: Alliance Biological Function
    • 2nd Tuesday: GO Consortium
    • 3rd Tuesday: Alliance Biological Function/GO-CAM Working Group
    • 4th Tuesday: GO-CAM Working Group
    • 5th Tuesday: ad hoc, as needed
  • One Zoom URL for all - https://stanford.zoom.us/j/976175422

Annotation Discussion

ND Annotations

  • Automatic deletion of ND-evidenced annotations
  • ND annotations to a root node term are intended to signify that the curator looked at all available evidence and the MF, BP, or CC of a gene/gene product is not known
  • GOA proposed to remove ND annotations automatically from their curation database because this was not happening manually
    • Note that curators can only update or remove annotations from their respective groups in Protein2GO
    • Annotation from only a select set of evidence codes would result in automatic removal of ND annotations
   ECO:0000269 (EXP) and its descendants
   ECO:0006056 (HTP) and its descendants
   ECO:0000250 (ISS) and its descendants
   ECO:0000317 (IGC) and its descendants
  • Generally agreed that when there is experimental or sequence-based evidence for a more granular annotation, the ND annotation should be removed
    • However, 'protein binding' MF annotations are thought of differently by different groups and we need to reach a consensus about how these MF annotations should be considered wrt automatically removing existing MF ND annotations
  • Proposal: as part of QC pipeline, alert groups to genes/gene products that have an ND annotation and also an annotation to a more granular term (any evidence code?)

PAINT Annotations

Annotation Review

  • 84 open annotation review tickets
  • Reminder to check go-annotation tracker tickets where your group has been assigned and finish up where you can
  • Questions? Please add questions/comments to the individual tickets
  • We can discuss questions on future calls, if needed