Annotation Conf. Call 2020-01-28: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "= Agenda and Minutes = *Present: == Noctua Form 2.0 == *Software updates made to ensure correct environment of all components *Additional updates: **Entity identifiers now d...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Agenda and Minutes = | = Agenda and Minutes = | ||
*Present: | *Present: | ||
== Annotation Relations == | == Annotation Relations == | ||
*Goal is to review use of relations across annotations (standard and GO-CAM) and the ontology to ensure consistency wherever possible | *Goal is to review use of relations across annotations (standard and GO-CAM) and the ontology to ensure consistency wherever possible | ||
* | *Relations to discuss this week: | ||
**' | **'activated by' | ||
**' | **'activated by' had been used to identify a chemical substance that increases the activity of the gene product. | ||
** | **We would like to instead model this with a 'binding activity' that 'directly positively regulates' a second, or main, molecular function enabled by the gene/gene product | ||
**The aim is to capture regulatory molecules, but not things like co-factors. | |||
**Sample GO-CAM model: http://noctua.geneontology.org/editor/graph/gomodel:5db9c9a500000296 | |||
Revision as of 17:29, 27 January 2020
Agenda and Minutes
- Present:
Annotation Relations
- Goal is to review use of relations across annotations (standard and GO-CAM) and the ontology to ensure consistency wherever possible
- Relations to discuss this week:
- 'activated by'
- 'activated by' had been used to identify a chemical substance that increases the activity of the gene product.
- We would like to instead model this with a 'binding activity' that 'directly positively regulates' a second, or main, molecular function enabled by the gene/gene product
- The aim is to capture regulatory molecules, but not things like co-factors.
- Sample GO-CAM model: http://noctua.geneontology.org/editor/graph/gomodel:5db9c9a500000296