Annotation Conf. Call 2020-01-28: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
**The aims are to: | **The aims are to: | ||
***1) model regulatory events in terms of activities enabled by gene products (this implies that we have knowledge of the regulatory mechanism) | ***1) model regulatory events in terms of activities enabled by gene products (this implies that we have knowledge of the regulatory mechanism) | ||
***2) capture bona fide regulatory molecules, but not cofactors such as ions or coenzymes | ***2) capture bona fide regulatory molecules (what is being 'sensed'), but not cofactors such as ions or coenzymes | ||
**Sample GO-CAM model: http://noctua.geneontology.org/editor/graph/gomodel:5db9c9a500000296 | **Sample GO-CAM model: http://noctua.geneontology.org/editor/graph/gomodel:5db9c9a500000296 | ||
Revision as of 18:03, 27 January 2020
Agenda and Minutes
- Present:
Annotation Relations
- Goal is to review use of relations across annotations (standard and GO-CAM) and the ontology to ensure consistency wherever possible
- Relations to discuss this week:
- 'activated by'
- https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/2718
- 'activated by' had been used to identify a chemical substance that increases the activity of the gene product.
- We would like to instead model this as:
- GeneProduct 1 'enables' binding (GO:0005488) 'has_input' (some chemical), 'directly_positively_regulates' molecular function
- GeneProduct 1 'enables' molecular function
- The aims are to:
- 1) model regulatory events in terms of activities enabled by gene products (this implies that we have knowledge of the regulatory mechanism)
- 2) capture bona fide regulatory molecules (what is being 'sensed'), but not cofactors such as ions or coenzymes
- Sample GO-CAM model: http://noctua.geneontology.org/editor/graph/gomodel:5db9c9a500000296