Annotation Extension Relation:has direct input: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
(52 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''THIS RELATION IS DEPRECATED'''
Curators should use  [http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Annotation_Extension_Relation:has_input has input] to capture inputs/substrates/targets of Molecular Functions
<pre style="color:#808080">
==Definition==
==Definition==


Identifies an entity directly affected (bound, transported, modified, consumed or destroyed) by the gene product's participation in MF or BP.
Identifies an entity directly affected (bound, transported, modified, consumed or destroyed) by the gene product's participation in a Molecular Function or Biological Process.
 
==Comment==
To use this relationship there must be evidence that the gene product in column 2 is known/predicted to bind the molecular target in column 16.
This can be a co-immunoprecipitation (for example) demonstrated in the paper being annotated, or from evidence available in another paper, or from evidence of protein interactions which have been demonstrated in another paper for orthologous molecules.
 
Without evidence of a relevant interaction use the relationship has_input
 
==Synonyms==
 
directly_localizes (NARROW)
 
has_direct_target (EXACT)
 
has_substrate (NARROW)


==Child terms==
==Child terms==
Line 7: Line 28:
* None
* None


==Annotation Extension Usage Examples==
==Scope of use==
 
===Domain===
 
BFO:0000007 ! process (Biological Process or Molecular Function)
 
===Range===
 
[[ENTITY_UNION:0000005]] ! chemical, gene product, or complex
 
</pre>
 
 
Back to [http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Annotation_Extension:_Capturing_participants Annotation Extension: Capturing participants]


{| class="wikitable" border="1"
Back to [http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Annotation_usage_examples_for_each_annotation_extension_relation  Annotation usage examples for each annotation extension relation]
|-
! Gene Name (col 2)
! GO ID (col 5)
! Reference (col 6)
! Evidence (col 7)
! Annotation Extension (col 16)
|-
| WBGene00000220
|GO:0000977 <span style="color:green">RNA polymerase II regulatory region sequence-specific DNA binding</span>
| PMID:21502138
| IDA
| has_direct_input(WB:WBGene00003033 <span style="color:green">lin-48</span>)|has_direct_input(WB:WBGene00000247 <span style="color:green">bec-1</span>)|has_direct_input(WB:WBGene00002980 <span style="color:green">lgg-1</span>)


|}
[[Category:relations]]
[[Category:annotation extension]]

Revision as of 16:57, 20 January 2020

THIS RELATION IS DEPRECATED

Curators should use has input to capture inputs/substrates/targets of Molecular Functions

 

==Definition==

Identifies an entity directly affected (bound, transported, modified, consumed or destroyed) by the gene product's participation in a Molecular Function or Biological Process.

==Comment==
To use this relationship there must be evidence that the gene product in column 2 is known/predicted to bind the molecular target in column 16.
 
This can be a co-immunoprecipitation (for example) demonstrated in the paper being annotated, or from evidence available in another paper, or from evidence of protein interactions which have been demonstrated in another paper for orthologous molecules.

Without evidence of a relevant interaction use the relationship has_input

==Synonyms==

directly_localizes (NARROW)

has_direct_target (EXACT)

has_substrate (NARROW)

==Child terms==

* None

==Scope of use==

===Domain===

BFO:0000007 ! process (Biological Process or Molecular Function) 

===Range===

[[ENTITY_UNION:0000005]] ! chemical, gene product, or complex


Back to Annotation Extension: Capturing participants

Back to Annotation usage examples for each annotation extension relation