Has input: Difference between revisions
Line 258: | Line 258: | ||
| Unfolded | | Unfolded | ||
| Pxxx <span style="color:green">transcription factor A</span> | | Pxxx <span style="color:green">transcription factor A</span> | ||
| | | GO:0001228 <span style="color:green">RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity involved in positive regulation of transcription</span> | ||
| PMID:xxx | | PMID:xxx | ||
| IDA | | IDA |
Revision as of 11:12, 19 August 2014
Back to Annotation usage examples for each annotation extension relation
Definition
Identifies an entity affected (bound, transported, modified, consumed or destroyed) by the gene product's participation in a molecular function or biological process.
Comment
If you know that the target is bound by the annotated gene product then consider using this child relationship
For Molecular Function GO terms such as endopeptidase activity use the relationship 'has_direct_input' (possibly has_substrate if this relationship is made available). The substrate included in the annotation extension should be known to bind the protein annotated.
The endopeptidase would also have the Biological Process GO term annotation (eg proteolysis with the annotation extension relationship 'has_input'.
For Molecular Function GO terms such as endopeptidase inhibitor activity use the relationship 'has_direct_input', the protein included in the annotation extension should be known to bind the protein annotated as an inhibitor.
If the annotation associated with the gene product is a regulation of biological process then consider using the child relationship
- 'has_regulation_target' (see text below)
If the Molecular Function annotation associated with the gene product is an enzyme regulator activity term then consider using the child relationship
- 'has_input' (see text below)
The endopeptidase inhibitor would also have two Biological Process GO term annotations eg:
- negative regulation of proteolysis with the annotation extension relationship 'has_regulation_target', with the substrate of the endopeptidase included in the annotation extension field
- negative regulation of endopeptidase activity, with the annotation relationship 'has_input' the endopeptidase that is inhibited in the annotation extension field
Synonyms
has_target (EXACT)
localizes (NARROW)
Child terms
If you know that the target is bound by the annotated gene product then consider using this child relationship
Scope of use
Domain
BFO:0000007 ! process (Biological Process or Molecular Function)
Range
ENTITY_UNION:0000005 ! chemical, gene product, or complex
Annotation Extension Usage Examples
Enhancing Molecular Function and Biological Process Annotations
Specifying the chemical that was applied and induced a 'response to chemicals'
I think that in_presence_of might be a better relationship choice, but left the example here awaiting confirmation (Ruth)
Here we use the has_input relation - the input to the process is a chemical, the output is some change in state as a result of exposure.
col5: GO:nnnnnn col16: has_input(CHEBI:nnnnn)
Sometimes it is better to request a GO term here
Cellular response to drug
Statement from paper: incubation of cells with low concentrations of phenformin and depletion of Ppm1E increased AMPK phosphorylation
So one of the annotations would be:
DB (Col 2) | Object (Col 3) | GO ID (Col 5) | Reference (Col 6) | Evidence (Col 7) | Extension (Col 16) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q8WY54 | PPM1E | GO:0035690 cellular response to drug | PMID:20801214 | IDA | has_input(CHEBI:6801 metformin) |
Specifying the protein which is a target of a Biological Process
Proteolysis targets
Statement from paper: MICA shedding by tumor cells was inhibited by silencing of the related ADAM10 and ADAM17 proteases.
No direct binding of MICA to ADAM10 and ADAM17 was shown therefore the relationship 'has_direct_input' was not applied.
So one of the annotations would be:
DB (Col 2) | Object (Col 3) | GO ID (Col 5) | Reference (Col 6) | Evidence (Col 7) | Extension (Col 16) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
O14672 | ADAM10 | GO:0006509 membrane protein ectodomain proteolysis | PMID:18676862 | IMP | has_input(UNIPROT:Q29983 MICA) |
Using examples (from above) to demonstrate Folding_and_Unfolding using the relationship has_input
Specifying the protein which is a target of a Biological Process
Proteolysis targets
Statement from paper: MICA shedding by tumor cells was inhibited by silencing of the related ADAM10 and ADAM17 proteases
Folded/unfolded | Gene Name (col 2) | GO ID (col 5) | Reference (col 6) | Evidence (col 7) | Annotation Extension (col 16) | Parent terms of new folded GO term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unfolded | O14672 ADAM10 | GO:0006509 membrane protein ectodomain proteolysis | PMID:18676862 | IMP | has_input(UNIPROT:Q29983 MICA) | |
Folded | O14672 ADAM10 | GO:0006509 membrane protein ectodomain proteolysis | PMID:18676862 | IMP | No new GO term created |
OWL class expression: GO:0006509 membrane protein ecodomain proteolysis AND has_input SOME UNIPROT:Q29983 MICA
No new term will be created in this example because this is outside of the scope of GO, although tools using GO could use the relationship to create the following:
Folded/unfolded | Gene Name (col 2) | GO ID (col 5) | Reference (col 6) | Evidence (col 7) | Annotation Extension (col 16) | Parent terms of new folded GO term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unfolded | O14672 ADAM10 | GO:0006509 membrane protein ectodomain proteolysis | PMID:18676862 | IMP | has_input(UNIPROT:Q29983 MICA) | |
Folded | O14672 ADAM10 | New GO term membrane protein ectodomain proteolysis of MICA | PMID:18676862 | IMP | GO:0006509 membrane protein ectodomain proteolysis |
OWL class expression: GO:0006509 membrane protein ecodomain proteolysis AND has_input SOME UNIPROT:Q29983 MICA
Specifying the gene which is a target of a transcription factor
gene transcription targets
Statement example:
DNA binding transcription factor A binds the promoter of Polo2 and increases transcription of Polo2
Folded/unfolded | Gene Name (col 2) | GO ID (col 5) | Reference (col 6) | Evidence (col 7) | Annotation Extension (col 16) | Parent terms of new folded GO term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unfolded | Pxxx transcription factor A | GO:0001228 RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity involved in positive regulation of transcription | PMID:xxx | IDA | has_regulation_target(UNIPROT:Qxxx Polo2) | |
Folded | Pxxx transcription factor A | GO:0001228 RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity involved in positive regulation of transcription | PMID:xxx | IDA | No new GO term created | |
Unfolded | Pxxx transcription factor A | GO:0044212 transcription regulatory region DNA binding | PMID:xxx | IDA | has_direct_input(UNIPROT:Qxxx Polo2) (could include a feature ID to specify the specific motif eg a SO ID or Ensembl ID for the gene ID) | |
Folded | Pxxx transcription factor A | GO:0044212 transcription regulatory region DNA binding | PMID:xxx | IDA | No new GO term created |
No new term will be created in this example because this is outside of the scope of GO, although tools using GO could use the relationship to create the following:
Folded/unfolded | Gene Name (col 2) | GO ID (col 5) | Reference (col 6) | Evidence (col 7) | Annotation Extension (col 16) | Parent terms of new folded GO term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unfolded | Pxxx transcription factor A | GO:0001228 RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity involved in positive regulation of transcription | PMID:xxx | IDA | has_input(UNIPROT:Qxxx Polo2) | |
Folded | Pxxx transcription factor A | GO:0001228 RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity involved in positive regulation of transcription of Polo2 | PMID:xxx | IDA | GO:0001228 RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity involved in positive regulation of transcription |
Back to Annotation usage examples for each annotation extension relation