Occurs in: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
==Definition==
==Definition==


'''p occurs_in c if and only if all of the participants of p are part_of c.'''
p occurs_in c if and only if all of the participants of p are part_of c.


==Child terms==
==Child terms==

Revision as of 07:52, 3 May 2012

Definition

p occurs_in c if and only if all of the participants of p are part_of c.

Child terms

  • None.

Annotation Extension Usage Examples

Enhancing Molecular Function and Biological Process Annotations

Specifying the cell or tissue type in which a process happens

Examples of this usage of occurs_in can be found on the documentation page for Column_16:_Cell_Type


Specifying the subcellular location in which a process happens

Biological process terms can be further specified by subcellular location. For example: plastid translational elongation

At the time of writing this term is not declared in GO. We should use the occurs_in relation:

 Col 5: GO:0006414 
 Col 16: occurs_in(GO:0009536)

Why, you might ask, can we not instead make two annotations to:

  • GO:0032544 ! plastid translation
  • GO:0006414 ! translational elongation

The answer is that co-annotation carries less information. Computationally we have no way of knowing these two processes are linked.

Note that the majority of the time, BP x CC cross-products should be pre-composed in the ontology. If the above scenario comes up, consider requesting a new term plastid translational elongation rather than using col 16.

Also note that when using a GO ID in col 16, a redundant annotation should sometimes be added. See Annotation_Cross_Products#Guidelines

Function-Process-Component threesomes

 col5: GO Function ID
 col16: part_of(GO PROCESS ID),occurs_in(GO CC ID)

Also include 2 redundant annotation lines