Annotation Extension Relation Documentation Jamboree: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 42: Line 42:


Should this be a plural relationship? Pretty much everything else in GO is singular.
Should this be a plural relationship? Pretty much everything else in GO is singular.
'''2. When to use has_input relationship and when to use has_regulation_target'''
has_regulation_target is limited to the domain GO:0065007 ! biological regulation
Can has_input be used with the domain GO:0065007 ! biological regulation?

Revision as of 14:59, 6 June 2014


Documentation pages

http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Annotation_usage_examples_for_each_annotation_extension_relation

http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Folding_and_Unfolding

Issues arising

Folded/Unfolded annotations

1. has_input relationship would annotations like these ever be folded?

DB (Col 2) Object (Col 3) GO ID (Col 5) Reference (Col 6) Evidence (Col 7) Extension (Col 16)
Q8WY54 PPM1E GO:0035690 cellular response to drugs PMID:20801214 IDA has_input(CHEBI:6801 metformin)
O14672 ADAM10 GO:0006509 membrane protein ectodomain proteolysis PMID:18676862 IMP has_input(UNIPROT:Q29983 MICA)

Other

1. acts_on_population_of

Should this be a plural relationship? Pretty much everything else in GO is singular.


2. When to use has_input relationship and when to use has_regulation_target

has_regulation_target is limited to the domain GO:0065007 ! biological regulation

Can has_input be used with the domain GO:0065007 ! biological regulation?