Annotation QC: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
===Problems in the ontology=== | ===Problems in the ontology=== | ||
===Varying granularity of annotations === | ===Varying granularity of annotations === | ||
Possible causes: | |||
* New (more granular) term was created since the annotation was made. | |||
How to address this: Should we warn curator when a more granular term is created an their database have annotations to the parent term? | |||
* Curator feels they do not have the expertise to annotate a gene. | |||
How to address this: Better communication: SF annotation tracker, email, wiki | |||
===Incorrect annotations=== | ===Incorrect annotations=== | ||
Errors during annotations. How to address this: | |||
Return to [Reference_Genome_Annotation_Project] | Return to [Reference_Genome_Annotation_Project] | ||
Revision as of 10:11, 22 January 2008
The purpose of this page is to find methods to check the quality of the GO annotations. There are four types of errors that we would like to find easily:
- Omission of annotations
- Problems in the ontology
- Varying granularity of annotations
- Incorrect annotations
Omission of annotations
Problems in the ontology
Varying granularity of annotations
Possible causes:
- New (more granular) term was created since the annotation was made.
How to address this: Should we warn curator when a more granular term is created an their database have annotations to the parent term?
- Curator feels they do not have the expertise to annotate a gene.
How to address this: Better communication: SF annotation tracker, email, wiki
Incorrect annotations
Errors during annotations. How to address this:
Return to [Reference_Genome_Annotation_Project]