Extensions2GO-CAM: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Paul Thomas (talk | contribs) |
Paul Thomas (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
**No more than one happens_during(BP) | **No more than one happens_during(BP) | ||
**No more than one part_of(BP) | **No more than one part_of(BP) | ||
**No more than one activated_by(ChEBI) | **No more than one activated_by(ChEBI) | ||
**No more than one inhibited_by(ChEBI) | **No more than one inhibited_by(ChEBI) | ||
Line 22: | Line 21: | ||
**No more than one has_input/has_direct_input(geneID or ChEBI) | **No more than one has_input/has_direct_input(geneID or ChEBI) | ||
**No more than one part_of(BP) | **No more than one part_of(BP) | ||
=has_regulation_target= | =has_regulation_target= | ||
NOTE CAN ONLY BE USED ON AN MF ANNOTATION | NOTE CAN ONLY BE USED ON AN MF ANNOTATION |
Revision as of 17:30, 23 August 2018
Simple conversions
These are relations that are essentially identical in extensions and GO-CAM
- If the aspect is F (column A)
- No more than one occurs_in(CC)
- No more than one occurs_in(CL)
- No more than one occurs_in(UBERON or EMAPA)
- No more than one has_input/has_direct_input(geneID or ChEBI)
- No more than one happens_during(BP)
- No more than one part_of(BP)
- No more than one activated_by(ChEBI)
- No more than one inhibited_by(ChEBI)
- If the aspect is C
- No more than one occurs_in(CC)
- No more than one occurs_in(CL)
- No more than one occurs_in(UBERON or EMAPA)
- If the aspect is P
- No more than one occurs_in(CC)
- No more than one occurs_in(CL)
- No more than one occurs_in(UBERON or EMAPA)
- No more than one has_input/has_direct_input(geneID or ChEBI)
- No more than one part_of(BP)
has_regulation_target
NOTE CAN ONLY BE USED ON AN MF ANNOTATION
- GP-A [regulation of molecular function Z] has_regulation_target GP-B
- can be expressed as [GP-A]<-enabled_by-[ GO:0003674]-regulates->[molecular function Z]-enabled_by->[GP-B]
- The variations on this are all children of the term “regulation of molecular function” (GO:0065009). Variations are “positive regulation of MF Z”, which would be expressed with the positively_regulates relation instead; “negative regulation of MF Z”. **Note that MF Z should appear in the logical definition of the term “regulation of MF Z”, so you can get the GO ID from that.
- GP-A [regulation of transcription] has_regulation_target GP-B
- can be expressed as [GP-A]<-enabled_by-[GO:0003674]-regulates->[transcription]-has_input->[GP-B]
- These are all children of “regulation of transcription, DNA templated” (GO:0006351). Similarly to above, there are positive/negative variations, and you can get the specific GO ID for [transcription] from the logical definition.
- Regulation of regulation of protein metabolic process (GO:0051246) and descendants.
- These can be modeled as GP-A<-enabled_by-[ GO:0003674]-regulates->[protein metabolic process]-has_input->GP-B
- Regulation of gene expression (GO:0010468) and descendants.
- These can be modeled like regulation of transcription below (it’s actually a more general case).
- Regulation of receptor internalization (GO:0002092) and descendants.
- These can be modeled like protein phosphorylation above.
- Protein localization (GO:0008104) and descendants.
- These can be modeled like protein phosphorylation.
- Protein ubiquitination (GO:0031396) and descendants.
- These can be modeled like protein phosphorylation.
- Regulation of protein localization (GO:0032880) and descendants.
- These should be modeled exactly the same way as protein localization above.