Full Text Indexing Progress: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Overview= | =Overview= | ||
There are two separate fronts of progress for FTI. The first is in the | |||
indexing system itself; this would include things like software used | |||
(Solr, Jetty , etc.), schema, deployment, and other low level issues | |||
that are probably not going to be hugely important to end-of-the-line | |||
users and programmers. The second is the consumption and use | |||
While there are some blurry points in this distinction (e.g. what | |||
about a perl API or JSON service), hopefully it will provide a logical | |||
way to divide most of the problems that will be faced. | |||
=System Progress= | |||
=Software Progress= | |||
=Design Progress= | =Design Progress= | ||
==One== | ==One== | ||
Experimental | |||
==Two== | ==Two== | ||
==???== | ==???== | ||
Revision as of 18:35, 20 September 2010
Overview
There are two separate fronts of progress for FTI. The first is in the indexing system itself; this would include things like software used (Solr, Jetty , etc.), schema, deployment, and other low level issues that are probably not going to be hugely important to end-of-the-line users and programmers. The second is the consumption and use
While there are some blurry points in this distinction (e.g. what about a perl API or JSON service), hopefully it will provide a logical way to divide most of the problems that will be faced.
System Progress
Software Progress
Design Progress
One
Experimental
Two
???
Target
Software
Current
Past
- ...
- ...
- ...