GO-CAM Conference Call - 2019-03-19: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→MInutes) |
|||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
*On call: Chris, David, Dmitry, Dustin, Edith, Elena, Giulia, Harold, Jim, Karen, Kevin, Kimberly, Marie-Claire, Monika, Petra, Rob, Sabrina, Seth, Shur-Jen, Stacia, Suzi, Tanya | *On call: Chris, David, Dmitry, Dustin, Edith, Elena, Giulia, Harold, Jim, Karen, Kevin, Kimberly, Marie-Claire, Monika, Petra, Rob, Sabrina, Seth, Shur-Jen, Stacia, Suzi, Tanya | ||
* We discussed the MOD imports and, in particular, reviewed the rules documentation on the wiki. | |||
* A a few questions that came up: | |||
** Will HTP annotations be included in the imports? | |||
***Yes, as long as they correspond to the manual parent evidence codes. | |||
** How will annotation metadata be handled? | |||
*** Right now, as comments. Future work may be done to refine how these are represented. | |||
** What is the evidence on the root MF nodes created for relating a gene to a BP? | |||
*** The evidence will be the same as the evidence for the gene's relationship to the BP. | |||
** Will inferred (deepened) annotations be included in the GPAD output? | |||
*** Yes, but part of the testing will be to compare input and output annotations for any differences. | |||
** Will annotations to regulation terms without an extension be imported 'as is' or modeled similarly to those with an extension? | |||
*** Annotations to regulation terms without an extension will be imported 'as is'. | |||
* All groups are encouraged to start looking at the [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AEAj39mxQnBsuccIxWhpjiFKcdCJLw6uIa1eXiAG1Hs/edit#gid=982570828 Google spreadsheet] where Dustin has listed extensions that don't fit the current set of rules to see if those extensions need revision or if we need a new rule. | |||
Revision as of 13:06, 19 March 2019
Meeting URL
- Please see the GO's Google calendar
- Contact Kimberly if you do not have access to the GO calendar
Agenda
GOC Meeting, Cambridge, UK, April 11th and 12th
- Fill out Google form for dinner choices, if attending the Thursday night dinner
MOD Import into Noctua
- Update on the status of the MGI and WB annotation imports into Noctua
- Work-in-progress: Documentation for Noctua MOD Imports
- Bulk of curator work is on checking annotation extensions
- Consistent and correct
- Annotation Extension Spreadsheet
Other Noctua Updates
Software
- Coming to noctua-dev for testing (Tremayne):
- New version of the Noctua form
- Noctua annotation review tool
- Feature in development (Laurent-Philippe):
- Model copying
MInutes
- On call: Chris, David, Dmitry, Dustin, Edith, Elena, Giulia, Harold, Jim, Karen, Kevin, Kimberly, Marie-Claire, Monika, Petra, Rob, Sabrina, Seth, Shur-Jen, Stacia, Suzi, Tanya
- We discussed the MOD imports and, in particular, reviewed the rules documentation on the wiki.
- A a few questions that came up:
- Will HTP annotations be included in the imports?
- Yes, as long as they correspond to the manual parent evidence codes.
- How will annotation metadata be handled?
- Right now, as comments. Future work may be done to refine how these are represented.
- What is the evidence on the root MF nodes created for relating a gene to a BP?
- The evidence will be the same as the evidence for the gene's relationship to the BP.
- Will inferred (deepened) annotations be included in the GPAD output?
- Yes, but part of the testing will be to compare input and output annotations for any differences.
- Will annotations to regulation terms without an extension be imported 'as is' or modeled similarly to those with an extension?
- Annotations to regulation terms without an extension will be imported 'as is'.
- Will HTP annotations be included in the imports?
- All groups are encouraged to start looking at the Google spreadsheet where Dustin has listed extensions that don't fit the current set of rules to see if those extensions need revision or if we need a new rule.