GO-CAM Noctua Call 2018-03-14

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Meeting URL

Agenda

Progress Towards Noctua 1.0 Release

Simple Annoton Editor

  • Review tickets on github tracker
  • Incorporating annotation rules into the SAE
    • What plans do we have for this enhancement?

Consumer Interface, Downloads

  • Any items we want to discuss at this point?

Minutes

  • On call: David H., Dustin, Edith, Harold, Jim, Karen, Kevin, Kimberly, Laurent-Phillipe, Liz, Pascale, Paul T., Rob, Sabrina, Sage, Seth, Stacia, Suzi A., Suzi L., Tom

Progress Towards Noctua 1.0 Release

Annotation Extension Relations

  • Some relations that are currently used in annotation extensions are not available in the editors
  • How should these be handled in Noctua?
    • For example, 'has regulation target'
      • This has a property chain in go_rel of: regulates o has_participant
      • Do these property chains need to be reviewed?
      • If we want these, do we need SWRL rules?
    • Remove these relations from the 1.0 requirements
    • Look at their usage in conventional annotations; prioritize by most commonly used
      • Regulation of transcription would be a good place to start
      • We have input from this from Astrid
    • Map conventional annotations to GO-CAM models
    • Fit conventional annotation extensions to fit with GO-CAM representation
    • Idea here it to work towards revising conventional annotations to fit GO-CAM, not the other way around

GPAD Export Pipeline

  • Derived GPAD annotations need to be slurped up by the corresponding MOD or UniProt
  • Models available for slurping should only be production models
  • If curators use UniProtKB accessions for mouse annotations, for example, how would this work?
  • What should the pipeline be?
    • GO-CAM -> GPAD (id-collated) -> ID source -> organism/project-specific database
  • https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uR_32I2PYwGl6wZcmENETBV1GsgVtDx_xiHv5fr4xWE/edit
  • Who is ready to test the pipeline?
    • MGI
    • WB

Any Curators Still Not Associated with a Group?

  • Need to check users.yaml
  • Being associated with a group needs to be a prerequisite for annotating in Noctua
  • Older models still need to be re-assigned to a group
  • Seth, Jim, and Dustin (?) will look into this and see what models still need groups

Simple Annoton Editor

Proposal(s) for Consumer Interface, Downloads