GO 18th Consortium Meeting: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
===September 23-24th, 2007 Princeton, New Jersey===
== Brainstorming on Topics for upcoming 18th meeting ==
== Brainstorming on Topics for upcoming 18th meeting ==
# Delineating, and isolating, the different categories of "slims" and their usage. See [[Taxon_Main_Page]] for more discussion.
# Delineating, and isolating, the different categories of "slims" and their usage. See [[Taxon_Main_Page]] for more discussion.
Line 8: Line 10:
## Can/should regulation be broken down into parts, or should it be a collection of types?
## Can/should regulation be broken down into parts, or should it be a collection of types?


===GOC and Staff issues===
==GOC and Staff issues==
*The PIs should consider options for the future of the GO Editorial Office. Affiliation with EBI has numerous advantages (for both GO and EBI), but all four GOE staff will reach the 9-year limit by the end of the current NIH grant period.
*The PIs should consider options for the future of the GO Editorial Office (GOEO). Affiliation with EBI has numerous advantages (for both GO and EBI), but all four GOEO staff will reach the 9-year limit by the end of the current NIH grant period.
:(added at Michael's request)
:(added at Michael's request)

Revision as of 01:24, 18 July 2007

September 23-24th, 2007 Princeton, New Jersey

Brainstorming on Topics for upcoming 18th meeting

  1. Delineating, and isolating, the different categories of "slims" and their usage. See Taxon_Main_Page for more discussion.
  2. The scope of 'binding' terms in the function ontology:
    1. How granular should terms be?
    2. Should there be terms for substrate origin (e.g. "viral protein binding")? See SF 1674020.
  3. Discuss how we are going to handle regulates and relationships between regulation terms (DPH)
    1. Does regulates always mean the same thing in GO?
    2. Can/should regulation be broken down into parts, or should it be a collection of types?

GOC and Staff issues

  • The PIs should consider options for the future of the GO Editorial Office (GOEO). Affiliation with EBI has numerous advantages (for both GO and EBI), but all four GOEO staff will reach the 9-year limit by the end of the current NIH grant period.
(added at Michael's request)