GO Consortium Meeting 2007: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Venue) |
(→Topics) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Topics == | == Topics == | ||
Please add items below that you think need to be presented. We are not -yet- putting these in any particular order or time, | Please add items below that you think need to be presented. We are not -yet- putting these in any particular order or time, we're just collecting the topics we need to address while we are together. | ||
# The issue of using the GO_REF vs extension of the evidence codes to amplify upon the method that is used. | # The issue of using the GO_REF vs extension of the evidence codes to amplify upon the method that is used. | ||
# gp2protein file: | # gp2protein file: |
Revision as of 15:54, 8 October 2006
Topics
Please add items below that you think need to be presented. We are not -yet- putting these in any particular order or time, we're just collecting the topics we need to address while we are together.
- The issue of using the GO_REF vs extension of the evidence codes to amplify upon the method that is used.
- gp2protein file:
- The lagtime between when the protein sequences of a newly sequenced and annotated organism are published, and when they make it into UniProt. For example, even now only ~10% of 27,855 arabidopsis protein sequences are contained in Swiss-Prot. For the final release (version 5) of arabidopsis, 306 proteins (~1%) are available in Swiss-Prot and 374 in TrEMBL. Older arabidopsis sequences are found in TrEMBL, but fully 1/3 of the sequences found in the first release have changed over the life of the project.
- GOST needs to use the precise sequences, as supplied by the submitting group
- Handling multiple identifiers for gene products and sequences
- Evaluation of project tracking methods
Venue
Click here to register for this meeting. Please do this by October 31st Jesus College Jesus Lane, Cambridge, CB5 8BL, UK Cambridge, UK