GO clinic late 2009: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
Split into multicellular and cellular behaviour. Perhaps remove cellular behaviour altogether - as seems to confuse people? The multicellular term should mention central nervous system in its def. Should exclude plants in def (CNS would do this). [Jane & Val]
Split into multicellular and cellular behaviour. Perhaps remove cellular behaviour altogether - as seems to confuse people? The multicellular term should mention central nervous system in its def. Should exclude plants in def (CNS would do this). [Jane & Val]


===Biological motion=== (DONE)
New term: 'biological motion' term as a child of bp and parent to 'cell motion'. New term 'cilium motion' would be a child (or perhaps 'organelle motion' as a parent as there are probably several cell projections that move). Not sure how this might overlap with 'locomotion'. See [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2880076&group_id=36855&atid=440764|SF item]. Also, the cell motility/cell motion nomenclature is a bit confusing - the definitions are all fine though, just needs standardizing I think.


[[Category:Ontology]]
[[Category:Ontology]]

Latest revision as of 09:18, 22 December 2009

Behaviour

Split into multicellular and cellular behaviour. Perhaps remove cellular behaviour altogether - as seems to confuse people? The multicellular term should mention central nervous system in its def. Should exclude plants in def (CNS would do this). [Jane & Val]

===Biological motion=== (DONE)

New term: 'biological motion' term as a child of bp and parent to 'cell motion'. New term 'cilium motion' would be a child (or perhaps 'organelle motion' as a parent as there are probably several cell projections that move). Not sure how this might overlap with 'locomotion'. See item. Also, the cell motility/cell motion nomenclature is a bit confusing - the definitions are all fine though, just needs standardizing I think.