GO clinic late 2009: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Split into multicellular and cellular behaviour. Perhaps remove cellular behaviour altogether - as seems to confuse people? The multicellular term should mention central nervous system in its def. Should exclude plants in def (CNS would do this). [Jane & Val] | Split into multicellular and cellular behaviour. Perhaps remove cellular behaviour altogether - as seems to confuse people? The multicellular term should mention central nervous system in its def. Should exclude plants in def (CNS would do this). [Jane & Val] | ||
===Biological motion=== (DONE) | |||
New term: 'biological motion' term as a child of bp and parent to 'cell motion'. New term 'cilium motion' would be a child (or perhaps 'organelle motion' as a parent as there are probably several cell projections that move). Not sure how this might overlap with 'locomotion'. See [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2880076&group_id=36855&atid=440764|SF item]. Also, the cell motility/cell motion nomenclature is a bit confusing - the definitions are all fine though, just needs standardizing I think. | |||
[[Category:Ontology]] | [[Category:Ontology]] |
Latest revision as of 09:18, 22 December 2009
Behaviour
Split into multicellular and cellular behaviour. Perhaps remove cellular behaviour altogether - as seems to confuse people? The multicellular term should mention central nervous system in its def. Should exclude plants in def (CNS would do this). [Jane & Val]
===Biological motion=== (DONE)
New term: 'biological motion' term as a child of bp and parent to 'cell motion'. New term 'cilium motion' would be a child (or perhaps 'organelle motion' as a parent as there are probably several cell projections that move). Not sure how this might overlap with 'locomotion'. See item. Also, the cell motility/cell motion nomenclature is a bit confusing - the definitions are all fine though, just needs standardizing I think.