LEGO-style annotation ideas: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page is for collecting together thoughts and ideas on what we want from a new annotation system. Given a clean sheet, what would you want to capture? Examples are always useful. | This page is for collecting together thoughts and ideas on what we want from a new annotation system. Given a clean sheet, what would you want to capture? Examples are always useful. | ||
===What can't be fully captured in current format=== | |||
* Multiple pieces of evidence for a single assertion | |||
* Terms from external ontologies | |||
* Relationship between object being annotated and ontology term | |||
* For multi-organism processes, the role an organism is playing in a process | |||
===Future annotation areas=== | ===Future annotation areas=== | ||
Revision as of 10:30, 11 August 2011
This page is for collecting together thoughts and ideas on what we want from a new annotation system. Given a clean sheet, what would you want to capture? Examples are always useful.
What can't be fully captured in current format
- Multiple pieces of evidence for a single assertion
- Terms from external ontologies
- Relationship between object being annotated and ontology term
- For multi-organism processes, the role an organism is playing in a process
Future annotation areas
- There's likely to be a lot of data coming from metabolomics and metagenomics studies in the next few years e.g. the Human Microbiome Project so we might want to consider how you might annotate population-level processes
Useful links
- File:Paul's LEGO presentation from Bar Harbor Sept 2010.pdf
- File:Paul's LEGO white paper March 2010.pdf