LEGO March 21, 2016

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Bluejeans

https://bluejeans.com/969313231

Agenda

  • Software Updates
  • Demo of Form-Style Curation Interface
  • Plans for Upcoming Geneva Meeting
  • Relations Documentation

Minutes

  • On call: Chris, David H., David O-S., Giulia, Heiko, Kimberly, Paul T., Ruth, Seth, Suzi

Software updates

  • None this week; Seth has been working on AmiGO

Curation interface - form vs graphical

  • See github ticket: https://github.com/geneontology/noctua/issues/150
  • GO curators would want both a form and graphical UI for curation
  • Kimberly demo'ed the web-based curation form WB used before Protein2GO; this form is based on the Phenote curation tool
  • One important feature of a form interface is the ability to add evidence to multiple annotations and to be able to see the evidence while working (i.e., not having to click on a little box to add to each annoton, or having the evidence hidden behind an E)
  • Seth said he can come up with a solution to help add evidence to multiple annotons at the same time in the graphical view
  • The WB form interface has three sections: Editor/Query, Term Info, and Annotation Rows
  • The term info section provides information on entities (e.g. GO terms, genes, papers) and could be used to browse a paper
  • Design decision: have one row per annoton (i.e., MF, BP, CC and associated contextual information) or group adjacent rows into annotons, one annotation, and its contextual information, per row - What is easiest for different types of curation, i.e. conventional GO annotation vs. LEGO annotation?
  • Each annotation would contain information about the models that use it
  • Multiple evidences could be used to support an annotation
  • Come up with a few different prototypes that curators can test and then we can prioritize future development of the version curators find best to use
  • It's important for the tool to maximize curator efficiency so curators spend their time on annotating the biology, rather than on busywork of copy-paste, etc.
  • See Chris' mock-up in Google docs:
  • AI: David and Kimberly will work on Chris' mock-up and present at next meeting

LEGO/Noctua Workshop in Geneva

  • Need to come up with a rough outline for the workshop
  • How much time should we spend on it?
  • We can work on the March annotation consistency exercise paper
  • Maybe also work on a signaling pathway

ICBO Workshop

Relations Documentation

  • David and Kimberly reviewed Paul T.'s PowerPoint; will send edited version back for follow-up comments
  • Add to Dropbox once initial round of revisions is made