LEGO May 2, 2016: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "=Bluejeans= =Agenda= ==Software Updtes== ==GAF/GPAD== ==Documentation== ==Models Discussion== ===Determining the Extent of Upstream/Downstream to Capture in GAF/GPAD=== *Is ...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*Related to this, can new ontology terms be automatically generated from a model and curators given the option to add them to the ontology when they save their models? | *Related to this, can new ontology terms be automatically generated from a model and curators given the option to add them to the ontology when they save their models? | ||
*See: http://noctua.berkeleybop.org/editor/graph/gomodel:5716c41300000082 | *See: http://noctua.berkeleybop.org/editor/graph/gomodel:5716c41300000082 | ||
===cdc2 - Continuing Discussion from 2016-04-25=== | |||
*How to correctly represent regulatory activities and the corresponding entities? | |||
*See: http://noctua.berkeleybop.org/editor/graph/gomodel:5716c41300000003 | |||
Revision as of 17:11, 29 April 2016
Bluejeans
Agenda
Software Updtes
GAF/GPAD
Documentation
Models Discussion
Determining the Extent of Upstream/Downstream to Capture in GAF/GPAD
- Is there/could there be a mechanism whereby curators indicate which annotons to include as causally_upstream of GAF/GPAD output for a given model?
- Related to this, can new ontology terms be automatically generated from a model and curators given the option to add them to the ontology when they save their models?
- See: http://noctua.berkeleybop.org/editor/graph/gomodel:5716c41300000082
cdc2 - Continuing Discussion from 2016-04-25
- How to correctly represent regulatory activities and the corresponding entities?
- See: http://noctua.berkeleybop.org/editor/graph/gomodel:5716c41300000003