LEGO May 23, 2016

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Bluejeans

https://bluejeans.com/969313231

Agenda

Software Updates

  1. Form Interface for Curation
  2. RO View for Curators

GAF/GPAD

Still needed before we can import (into MGI):

Noctua Requirements

  1. Stable purl from which to retrieve files. (GH Noctua issue #200 - https://github.com/geneontology/noctua/issues/200)
  2. Folded annotations for individuals annotated by the regulates relation. (GH Noctua issue #189 - https://github.com/geneontology/noctua/issues/189)
  3. Strategy to create regulation target annotations in LEGO
  4. Annotation of isoforms. Can we start loading GPI files into the NEO.(https://github.com/geneontology/noctua/issues/278)
  5. Attribution to individual groups. For example 'MGI-Noctua'. (GH Noctua issue #84 - https://github.com/geneontology/noctua/issues/84)
  6. An automated QC check on annotations made in Noctua. For example, tagging annotations that don't have evidence. (https://github.com/geneontology/noctua/issues/255)
  7. Attribution of curator comments and evidence sentences to the appropriate reference. (https://github.com/geneontology/noctua/issues/280)
  8. Classic qualifiers in Noctua. (https://github.com/geneontology/noctua/issues/310)

Annotation Data flow outstanding Requirements

  1. Once we have imported annotations into MODs from Noctua, those annotations will be incorporated into output files, GPAD and GAF. Is there a strategy for them not being duplicated when they are picked up by the GOC?
  2. Will annotations in AMIGO2 continue to only come from the 'official providers' or will they be loaded directly?
  3. If annotations cycle through the 'official providers', then the official providers should all be encouraged to load GPAD files so that the associated annotation properties in column 12 of the GPAD file are not lost. How important is this since we have the original OWL saved?
  4. What is the order of priority of loaded annotations? When we strip duplicates, which annotations get priority?

Annotations/Model Discussion

Discussion of the Wnt signaling model

http://noctua.berkeleybop.org/editor/graph/gomodel:5716c41300000082

  1. Explanation of the models and the relations
  2. How will the individuals in the model chain?
  3. What annotations do we expect to get from a model like this?
  4. Is there a mechanism for limiting the annotations that are generated?
  1. How would the model differ if we had the term 'cell-cell signaling by wnt'. Draft term:

cell-cell signaling by wnt: "Any process that mediates the transfer of information from one cell to another, mediated by a wnt-family protein ligand. This process includes wnt signal transduction in the receiving cell, release of wnt ligand from a secreting cell as well as any processes that actively facilitate wnt transport and presentation to receptor on the receiving cell."

 <-- part_of wnt signaling
 <-- part_of wnt protein secretion

Question: should cell-cell signaling terms be extended to include ligand processing steps (e.g. the palmitoylation step in the above model)?

Protein Binding Annotations in Noctua

http://noctua.berkeleybop.org/editor/graph/gomodel:5716c41300000664

  • Use has input relation for annoton? has direct input?
    • In GAF/GPAD output, this will result in nothing in the With/From column
  • Use With/From column only?
  • Use both?

Expanding ECO use to Model Pathways More Clearly

  • For constructing pathways in LEGO, it could be useful to have more granular IGI evidence codes to support the assertion that gene products act in the same or different pathways
  • Work from the BioGrid, Princeton, and WB groups on a genetic interaction ontology might help inform this

Minutes

  • On call:
    • Heiko (LBL)
    • Kimberly (WB)
    • Melanie (EBI)
    • Sabrina (Zfin)