Manager 17June2015: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Agenda= | =Agenda= | ||
==Attending SAB at next consortium meeting== | |||
* Should we plan on attending the morning session of the SAB? (need to know for travel plans) | |||
==Update on autophagy== | ==Update on autophagy== | ||
Revision as of 10:16, 17 June 2015
Agenda
Attending SAB at next consortium meeting
- Should we plan on attending the morning session of the SAB? (need to know for travel plans)
Update on autophagy
- FYI, The working group is meeting bimonthly. Among things in agenda: working on related SF requests; list of autophagy regulatory proteins for annotation; links with apoptosis and mitochondrial events.
PhD thesis on GO
- FYI, Paola is external advisor for a PhD student, thesis title: “A matter of style. How classification practices and bio-ontologies shape current biomedical research” (graduation ~ Oct 2015). Not sure yet if this work will be published as such. Happy to send round Introduction and Working Plan to managers' list if you wish.
Author feedback form
Motivation
- We have been asked several times about the quality of our annotations
- Paul T mentioned that, at the Synapse meeting, an author said the annotations made from his paper were not accurate.
- How about we send a form to authors and ask if the annotations made from their papers are correct or not?
http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Proposal_for_Author_Feedback_for_annotations#Specifications