Manager 20Oct10: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with '==Agenda== *ECO proposal: **Pascale mentioned that other curators were interested in knowing about the new ECO proposal. Can we post the proposal (and all the comments so far) …') |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*ECO proposal: | *ECO proposal: | ||
**Pascale mentioned that other curators were interested in knowing about the new ECO proposal. Can we post the proposal (and all the comments so far) on the biocurators mailing list? | **Pascale mentioned that other curators were interested in knowing about the new ECO proposal. Can we post the proposal (and all the comments so far) on the biocurators mailing list? | ||
**there were some email exchanges about the proposal. What next? Should we form a WG, have conf.calls regularly and come to agreement? By when do we want to | **there were some email exchanges about the proposal. What next? Should we form a WG, have conf.calls regularly and come to agreement? By when do we want to move to this system? | ||
*Protein binding: | *Protein binding: |
Revision as of 21:26, 19 October 2010
Agenda
- ECO proposal:
- Pascale mentioned that other curators were interested in knowing about the new ECO proposal. Can we post the proposal (and all the comments so far) on the biocurators mailing list?
- there were some email exchanges about the proposal. What next? Should we form a WG, have conf.calls regularly and come to agreement? By when do we want to move to this system?
- Protein binding:
- At the GOC meeting we agreed to explore the possibility of incorporating interaction data from bioGRID/Intact/IMAX. In terms of priority, where does this fit? Should we form a working group?
- Evidence summation:
- I started a wiki page with some notes. Again, not sure where it fits in terms of priority. Seems like ECO needs to be in place first. Can we form a WG and start discussing this regularly?