Manager 22Sep10: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Annotation Group" Priorities== | ==Annotation Group" Priorities== | ||
# educate annotators; new monthly annotation conference call | # educate annotators; new monthly annotation conference call: Rama to send an email about monthly call. | ||
# change annotation jamborees: everyone does the same paper? Plan is to do it the next one in November | |||
# loading GAF files - how can we help groups identify appropriate files, procedures | # loading GAF files - how can we help groups identify appropriate files, procedures | ||
# improvements to documentation on the website | # improvements to documentation on the website | ||
# 1st phase of QC checks is almost in place, by October probably still working out with Chris how to do soft QC checks, e.g. communicating with groups what they need to do, including keeping track of things that have already been checked; tracking things that have actually been removed (so that we can give some stats for the grant showing actual improvement) | # 1st phase of QC checks is almost in place, by October probably still working out with Chris how to do soft QC checks, e.g. communicating with groups what they need to do, including keeping track of things that have already been checked; tracking things that have actually been removed (so that we can give some stats for the grant showing actual improvement) | ||
Revision as of 10:28, 21 September 2010
Discussion topics
- Broad annotation proposal: WG:
- evidence codes: proof of principle for chain of evidence: WG:
- dealing with column 16 in AmiGO : software? is the documentation finished? create a WG?
Annotation Group" Priorities
- educate annotators; new monthly annotation conference call: Rama to send an email about monthly call.
- change annotation jamborees: everyone does the same paper? Plan is to do it the next one in November
- loading GAF files - how can we help groups identify appropriate files, procedures
- improvements to documentation on the website
- 1st phase of QC checks is almost in place, by October probably still working out with Chris how to do soft QC checks, e.g. communicating with groups what they need to do, including keeping track of things that have already been checked; tracking things that have actually been removed (so that we can give some stats for the grant showing actual improvement)