Manager 6November2013

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Agenda Items

Present: Rama, Rachael, David, Kimberly, Chris, Pascale, Huaiyu, Judy, Suzi


Automated Phenotype-Based GO Annotations

  • Can we allow use of both a published paper and a GO_REF in the same annotation? Cardinality of the reference field can be >1, but the annotation documentation only refers to cases where a publication has identifiers in different databases, e.g. PubMed and a MOD database. I'd like to include a GO_REF for the WormBase Phenotype2GO-based annotations, but also still include the original publication from which the phenotype information was curated. The GO_REF would explain the methodology used to create the resulting Biological Process annotation. [Kimberly]
    • Good idea. We can create a new subclass of IMP in ECO and use the gaf to eco mapping (which takes a evidence code + reference pair and maps it to an evidence type). But really we need a way to represent combinatorial evidence. This is analogous to F->P and P->C inferences, where we embed the fact an inference was made using assigned_by=GOC, which is not ideal.

Discussion:

  • How can we improve phenotype-based GO annotations?
  • Downstream effects have long been problematic for phenotype-based GO annotations, especially when these annotations are based on a mapping file (Phenotype Ontology Term : GO Biological Process Term).
  • Consider constructing a more rules-based approach to applying the BP annotation.
  • To what extent can we make use of the ontology structure (e.g., inter-ontology links) to aid in a rules-based approach?
  • To what extent can we improve the mappings between PO and GO terms? Start with molecular processes -> cellular processes -> organismal processes.
  • How should we handle cases where a BP annotation is the result of cumulative results, i.e. a summation of phenotypes?


Action Item: Draft a GO_REF for BP annotations inferred from Phenotype Ontology annotations that documents curation pipeline and entities included in the With/From column, e.g. Variation IDs, RNAi experiment IDs, Phenotype Ontology terms, Paper IDs. [Kimberly]

Action Item: Update documentation about what can be included in the With/From column for IMP annotations to include paper identifiers. [Rachael, Rama]

Action Item: Survey existing annotations to find suspect (outlier) BP annotations. [Suzi, Chris]

Action Item: Assemble use cases where phenotype-based annotations would be either misleading or inconsistent with manual GO annotation practices. [GO Curators]


BioCurator Meeting

  • What are GO's plans for the meeting?
  • Would be good to have a coordinated set of talks - start a wiki page for ideas?
  • Submit a paper for the Database issue? Just abstracts?
  • Who is going to the meeting?

Action Item: Add abstract deadline to GO calendar - DONE [Suzi]

Papers - November 15th, 2013

Abstract for Posters - February 10, 2014

Action Item: Create wiki page for ideas.

Ideas: enrichment analysis strategies, MGI's phenotype to BP pipeline, apoptosis


GO Wiki Editing

  • Chris, Seth have added a Plug-in for the Wiki that will force you to add a category for any new page.