Manager Call 2017-11-15: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
==Update: Maintaining GO annotations for inactive projects==
==Update: Maintaining GO annotations for inactive projects==
Pascale contacted Sandra and Tony; agree to have GOA /GOC maintainers of the annotations
Pascale contacted Sandra and Tony; agree to have GOA /GOC maintainers of the annotations
* "We (GOA) already look after the PINC, GDB, and RI annotations, and have done so since before I joined the EBI.
The contact that we had for DFLAT was Heather Wick (hwick@cs.tufts.edu), but I'm not sure whether she's still active - I suspect not, but Harold might know, as he acted as her checker when she first started using P2G."


* Next, we're going to need a contact address that we send reports and the output of sanity checks to; we'd prefer this to be a group email, rather than the address of an individual, so that they stand a fighting chance of being seen and acted upon. Is it worth creating a new email address (zombie-annotations@geneontology.org maybe?) which can then be forwarded to the appropriate GO_Central curators?
(Pascale:)
I am not sure what you mean. This list would be a ‘go-central’ email that the go-central curators would receive? I guess I was thinking that GO-central curators would be the ones disputing the annotations but it’s true that it can come from anyone.
Yes, that's the idea - and remember that it's not just about disputes; it would be the email address to which any reports generated by our regular sanity checks would be sent.


==Git Tickets==
==Git Tickets==

Revision as of 08:16, 14 November 2017

Agenda: Pascale Minutes: David (on vacation)


Update: Maintaining GO annotations for inactive projects

Pascale contacted Sandra and Tony; agree to have GOA /GOC maintainers of the annotations

  • "We (GOA) already look after the PINC, GDB, and RI annotations, and have done so since before I joined the EBI.

The contact that we had for DFLAT was Heather Wick (hwick@cs.tufts.edu), but I'm not sure whether she's still active - I suspect not, but Harold might know, as he acted as her checker when she first started using P2G."

  • Next, we're going to need a contact address that we send reports and the output of sanity checks to; we'd prefer this to be a group email, rather than the address of an individual, so that they stand a fighting chance of being seen and acted upon. Is it worth creating a new email address (zombie-annotations@geneontology.org maybe?) which can then be forwarded to the appropriate GO_Central curators?

(Pascale:) I am not sure what you mean. This list would be a ‘go-central’ email that the go-central curators would receive? I guess I was thinking that GO-central curators would be the ones disputing the annotations but it’s true that it can come from anyone. Yes, that's the idea - and remember that it's not just about disputes; it would be the email address to which any reports generated by our regular sanity checks would be sent.

Git Tickets

PanTree IDs in 'with' column https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1673