Manager Call 2017-11-15: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Update: Maintaining GO annotations for inactive projects== | == Update: Maintaining GO annotations for inactive projects == | ||
Pascale contacted Sandra and Tony; agree to have GOA /GOC maintainers of the annotations | Pascale contacted Sandra and Tony; agree to have GOA /GOC maintainers of the annotations | ||
* "We (GOA) already look after the PINC, GDB, and RI annotations, and have done so since before I joined the EBI. | * "We (GOA) already look after the PINC, GDB, and RI annotations, and have done so since before I joined the EBI. | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Yes, that's the idea - and remember that it's not just about disputes; it would be the email address to which any reports generated by our regular sanity checks would be sent. | Yes, that's the idea - and remember that it's not just about disputes; it would be the email address to which any reports generated by our regular sanity checks would be sent. | ||
==Git Tickets== | == Git Tickets == | ||
PanTree IDs in 'with' column | PanTree IDs in 'with' column | ||
https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1673 | https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1673 | ||
== Release of New IDAs == | |||
*Annotations made in PAINT are not being released? | |||
*Pipeline needs to be reviewed | |||
== Dockathon == | |||
*Let's confirm dates | |||
[[Category: GO Managers Meetings]] | [[Category: GO Managers Meetings]] |
Revision as of 11:29, 15 November 2017
Agenda: Pascale Minutes: David (on vacation)
Update: Maintaining GO annotations for inactive projects
Pascale contacted Sandra and Tony; agree to have GOA /GOC maintainers of the annotations
- "We (GOA) already look after the PINC, GDB, and RI annotations, and have done so since before I joined the EBI.
The contact that we had for DFLAT was Heather Wick (hwick@cs.tufts.edu), but I'm not sure whether she's still active - I suspect not, but Harold might know, as he acted as her checker when she first started using P2G."
- Next, we're going to need a contact address that we send reports and the output of sanity checks to; we'd prefer this to be a group email, rather than the address of an individual, so that they stand a fighting chance of being seen and acted upon. Is it worth creating a new email address (zombie-annotations@geneontology.org maybe?) which can then be forwarded to the appropriate GO_Central curators?
(Pascale:) I am not sure what you mean. This list would be a ‘go-central’ email that the go-central curators would receive? I guess I was thinking that GO-central curators would be the ones disputing the annotations but it’s true that it can come from anyone. Yes, that's the idea - and remember that it's not just about disputes; it would be the email address to which any reports generated by our regular sanity checks would be sent.
Git Tickets
PanTree IDs in 'with' column https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1673
Release of New IDAs
- Annotations made in PAINT are not being released?
- Pipeline needs to be reviewed
Dockathon
- Let's confirm dates