Manager Call 2017-11-15: Difference between revisions
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
*How would other annotations be incorporated into a pipeline (i.e. GAF) if these annotations are abandoned? | *How would other annotations be incorporated into a pipeline (i.e. GAF) if these annotations are abandoned? | ||
*Need an SOP for this, e.g. GOA takes over non-MOD species, MODs take over for their species | *Need an SOP for this, e.g. GOA takes over non-MOD species, MODs take over for their species | ||
*Need to define GO_Central | *'''ACTION:'''Need to define GO_Central | ||
**Who? | **Who? | ||
**What are their responsibilities? | **What are their responsibilities? | ||
*'''ACTION:''' Create a GO_Central mailing list | |||
*Use [https://github.com/geneontology/go-site/blob/master/metadata/groups.yaml groups.yaml] to better organize groups | *Use [https://github.com/geneontology/go-site/blob/master/metadata/groups.yaml groups.yaml] to better organize groups | ||
Revision as of 12:23, 15 November 2017
Agenda: Pascale Minutes: David (on vacation)
Agenda
Update: Maintaining GO annotations for inactive projects
Pascale contacted Sandra and Tony; agree to have GOA /GOC maintainers of the annotations
- "We (GOA) already look after the PINC, GDB, and RI annotations, and have done so since before I joined the EBI.
The contact that we had for DFLAT was Heather Wick (hwick@cs.tufts.edu), but I'm not sure whether she's still active - I suspect not, but Harold might know, as he acted as her checker when she first started using P2G."
- Next, we're going to need a contact address that we send reports and the output of sanity checks to; we'd prefer this to be a group email, rather than the address of an individual, so that they stand a fighting chance of being seen and acted upon. Is it worth creating a new email address (zombie-annotations@geneontology.org maybe?) which can then be forwarded to the appropriate GO_Central curators?
(Pascale:) I am not sure what you mean. This list would be a ‘go-central’ email that the go-central curators would receive? I guess I was thinking that GO-central curators would be the ones disputing the annotations but it’s true that it can come from anyone. Yes, that's the idea - and remember that it's not just about disputes; it would be the email address to which any reports generated by our regular sanity checks would be sent.
Git Tickets
PanTree IDs in 'with' column https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1673
Release of New IDAs
- Annotations made in PAINT are not being released?
- Pipeline needs to be reviewed
Dockathon
- Let's confirm dates
Minutes
- On call: Chris, Huaiyu, Kimberly, Pascale, Paul T., Suzi
Update: Maintaining GO annotations for inactive projects
- GOA looks after PINC, GDB, and RI annotations
- What does this really mean?
- How would other annotations be incorporated into a pipeline (i.e. GAF) if these annotations are abandoned?
- Need an SOP for this, e.g. GOA takes over non-MOD species, MODs take over for their species
- ACTION:Need to define GO_Central
- Who?
- What are their responsibilities?
- ACTION: Create a GO_Central mailing list
- Use groups.yaml to better organize groups